[bksvol-discuss] Re: Books rated excellent recently added to the collection that are really only good

  • From: eric troup <yakkoman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:08:13 +0100

Sorry, I can't. If someone reads that and thinks it's a scanning issue, then my reputation is on the line. I pride myself on my scanning, and while I see your point about it saying something about a publisher when a book is poorly edited, I'm not reading the book to analyze the publisher. I'm reading the book to either get information or a good story, and either way, don't need to be distracted by obvious bad editing. To be fair, it really annoys me when I'm reading a printed book, so if I can alleviate that problem for others, so much the better.


Having said al that, if the weird grammar or what-have-you occurs in poetry, I leave it alone. Poetry is so rhythm-dependent that I don't feel right interfering with that.

On 18 Apr 2008, at 03:40, Lora wrote:

As much as those things bug me, too, I want to know what the publisher
published, not what we changed it to. After all, it says something about a publisher if the editing of a book was poor. More to the point, there are some authors with such peculiar writing styles that it'd be hard to know
just what they intended to write.  William S. Burroughs is an example.

Even though those things leap out at me, too, I dodge out of the way, and
let them go merrily by. <Smile>


-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of eric troup
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:25 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Books rated excellent recently added to the
collection that are really only good

I suppose you're right, but I have a real hard time not correcting things like "He begin to notice he was sweating as the lights dimmed." I know we're not supposed to fix it, but dammit, that's supposed to be "began to notice!" Don't get me wrong, I don't fix sentence structure or anything intrusive like that, but there are times when it was clearly an editor's oops, and I do have a hard time not fixing those. They jump out at me like
muggers on a darkly-lit street.

On 17 Apr 2008, at 10:31, Lora wrote:

Hi,

Like you, I don't do a global find and replace, because that can
result in new and interesting errors that need to be fixed later. But
like you, when I find an error, I do a find, and replace things on a
one at a time basis.

Yes, we can spell check as we read.  JAWS will announce spelling
errors.
You just need to make sure it's not announcing grammar errors, too, as
that can become annoying.  Many novels don't quite pass the grammar
check, and it reports lots of false errors.  Besides, we're not here
to correct grammar.


-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Grandma
Cindy
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 9:50 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Books rated excellent recently added to
the collection that are really only good

My method is slightly different from yours, though I've thought of
doing a spell-check first. However, I don't. I read the book with the
spell- check on--I don't know if blind people can do that or if it
would be too annoying.
I correct as I go, and when I find an incorrect word that us actually
a real word but not the right one, I do a find and replace for
others--not a global replace, though; I've been caught too many times
having changed things that shouldn't have been changed and having to
go back and correct them and I've learned my lesson. When I've
finished reading the book, I do a final spell-check, and usually I do
find a few--very few--words that I've missed--and I do a final
page-number check.

I don't validate indices or bibliographies, but I don't delete them,
either.
I offer to do them later if a reader would like me to.

G.Cindy


Hi Judy and Others,

I am always surprised when I download an excellent book and find that
it's definitely not.  Although these books are frustrating
discoveries, I think the majority of Excellent books are deserving of
that rating.

Getting a book up to that rating is a joint effort, though.  Like
you, I appreciate the scanners' comments, explaining the validation
steps that they followed before submitting the book.  It doesn't
change my approach to validating, but it informs me of how much time
my validation process is likely to take.

For what it's worth, I begin by searching for the number 1, in
combinations such as  1 1' 1. 1? And so forth.

I then search for random characters that typically don't belong in
the
book:
caret, accent, tilde, percent, pound, and so on.  By finding these
and eliminating them, if appropriate, I get an overall glimpse of how
much validating needs to be done.

Spell-check or not to spell-check:  I then make a determination on
whether I'll run the spellchecker. For most novels and nonfiction, I
will; but for books such as Buddhism in Action, where I'm battling
two spelling problems, lots of Hindi words and lots of scanographical
errors that resulted in actual words, I've determined that it isn't
worth it to run spell check.
I'll rely on my full reading of the book to catch errors.

I then scan for common scanos, such as die for the and comer for
corner.  If I don't find lots of these, I figure it's a good sign.

I usually then start reading the book.  Since I'm going to read
straight through, this is when I check things like whether all the
pages are there, whether lines are missing, whether certain text is
garbled, etc.

I've found that there are errors that are better caught with speech,
and other errors better caught with Braille.

Example:  One excellent book I downloaded might have read all right
with Braille, but was a nightmare when I read it with speech.  This
was a book I wanted to read, and one I did read, even though there
weren't spaces after quotation marks, resulting in things like, "I
hate this,"she said. (Funny thing is, JAWS reads this just fine, but
my Pacmate tried to run this and she together because there was no
space. It did this all through the book, because neither the scanner
or validator went in and put spaces after the quotation marks.  This
is the kind of thing we need to find good ways to catch.

Finally, if the book has indices or other extras, I make a
determination as to whether they can be salvaged.  I think I've only
ever deleted one index, which was very nearly garbled beyond
recognition.
It was for a very short
book, and I felt it didn't add much to the book.

As I'm uploading, I review everything that will be visible when the
book goes into the collection.  For instance, I check the short and
long synopses, title, author, publisher, copyright date, ISBN, and
the selected categories and adult rating etc., to make sure it looks
good.

I'm not saying I won't miss things, but this is the rough process I
use.

One of my frustrations is when a scanner uploads a book and marks it
as excellent, and then I open the book and it's clearly not.  I
downloaded one recently where I found lots of missing words or
garbled lines, and I knew I wouldn't be able to correct it easily. I
simply returned the book to step one, as I figured it'd take more
effort to fix it than I felt I could manage. I guess I could see how
it might have gotten an excellent rating, as there were good-sized
chunks of very readable text, but when it went bad, it was really
bad.  I'd appreciate an honest rating.
The book probably
deserved good, which at least would have warned potential validators
that it would require a fair bit of work.

May I ask scanners how they determine whether to rate their
submissions as good or excellent?

And I'd love to see Bookshare scan the book on initial submission,
and offer a potential rating.  Does it do this yet?  I know it's
something we've talked about in the past.

Finally, I'd love to see a way to leave a comment as to why a
validator returned a book to step one.  This could include comments
such as: Frequent Hindi words; not familiar enough to validate ... Or
has lots of pictures that will require interpretation by a sighted
person ... Or even ... This book has too many errors for me to
validate at this time.

I hope there's value in some of this.  Mostly, it's just me thinking
publicly.


-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judy s.
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 5:08 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Books rated excellent recently added to the
collection that are really only good

Let me add my 'ditto' to the complaints posted here today about books
entering the collection recently that aren't up to snuff.

I was just crabbing off-list to Grandma Cindy about this last week.
I've downloaded several books this last month that had just entered
the collection which had many obvious errors, but were rated
excellent.  I've certainly missed stuff myself when validating, even
though I read through every single book I validate, but the errors I
found in downloaded books were things like chapter after chapter with
"1"
instead of "I" in the text.

As a validator, I appreciate scanners like Shelley and Mayrie (and
many
others) who put in their comments whether or not they've read the
scan through, if they've spell-checked it, stripped headings,
verified page numbers and the like.
I'm much more likely to download a book from the step 1 list if that
information is available, because I know what to expect and can judge how much time I will have to allocate to give that book the attention
it might need.

Judy s.


To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a
list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the
subject line.

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a
list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the
subject line.




***WISH LIST (CALLED REQUESTED ADDITIONS TO THE BOOKSHARE
COLLECTION)IS AVAILABLE AT
http://people.delphiforums.com/jamiecalton/Book_Requests.htm
http://www.friendsofbookshare.org/
http://studentpages.alma.edu/~07jmyate/book_requests.htm

A LIST OF BOOKS CURRENTLY BEING SCANNED IS AVAILABLE AT
http://people.delphiforums.com/jamiecalton/scanning.html

Jake's site for useful links: http://www.jbrownell.com/bkslinks.html



______________________________________________________________________
______
________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a
list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the
subject line.

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a
list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the
subject line.


To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.


To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: