On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:05:54PM -0700, justin corwin wrote:
I have to say, that article is not very convincing. It reads more like a
bitter "junior pilot" complaining about his superiors he believed treated
him badly and got unevenly rewarded because of union seniority. The few
references he makes overall about pilots union effects on airlines are
speculative or just straight extrapolation, most of it is just about the
disparity between senior and junior staffers, which is maybe unfair, but
meaningless to overall cost to the airline if they balance out. The
'positive feedback' effect he proposes exists in all industries, you just
swap out 'senior pilots' for 'management', no evil unions are required to
ensure that expensive powerful people are protected at the cost of junior
expendables.
The numbers don't quite work either. Even if an airplane is staffed by
super senior pilots($300k/yr), who are making only that flight that day,
their salaries amount to 821 dollars a day, so even three of them would
hardly make a dent in the average take on a flight cross country ($54k).
Particularly when compared to the fuel costs ($34k right now for a 767),
which fluctuate in value more than the three super senior pilots salaries
put together in an average year in one such fill up according to
http://www.indexmundi.com/commodities/?commodity=jet-fuel .