We do need to be cautious of new tech engine risks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=226&v=Zad8RuKCl0s
Troy
-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Anthony Cesaroni
Sent: Wednesday, 16 September 2015 11:57 AM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Rocket Labs
Can anyone on the list cite one rocket engine, including all the ones
considered "proven and successful" that don't have any inherent,
"technological' risks?
None come to mind. :-)
Best.
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
-----Original Message-----
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of KEN BIBA
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:31 PM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Rocket Labs
Thanks folks. Anyone have opinions about the technology risks of their
motor? Seems to me to be the big issue.
K
On Sep 15, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Ed LeBouthillierwrote:
<codemonky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
launch system?
Anyone here have opinions or information about Rocket Labs and their
LEO
investors are quality Silicon Valley VCs - Bessemer and Khosla Ventures.
What I find particularly intriguing is that their two major venture
pretty.
I don't have anything profound to add, but I agree that their hardware
is
possible multiple failures early in their launch program. Obviously,
One thing that will be interesting is how they're set up to deal with
already getting late in the year. They have a flight plan which includes
Their website says a first launch "...planned for 2015..." and it's
have deep pockets. I wish them the best. None of this is easy.
I certainly like their "spunk." This is a tough business when you
don't