[AR] Re: Ozone layer was Re: Removing Coking Deposits

  • From: David Masten <dmasten@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:53:05 -0700

I was lectured at one point about how every wind is a crosswind to VTVL. In 2009 we determined that while this is true, a VTVL's crosswind limit may be several times the crosswind capability of most airplanes, and then demonstrated it with a VTVL vehicle in 35 knot winds with gusts to 47 knots. (Xoie, the weekend before Xoie won the Lunar Lander Challenge).

David Masten
CTO
Masten Space Systems
415-244-9171

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments
are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are
not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

On 9/20/2016 8:50 AM, Robert Steinke wrote:

I'm curious why a WWJ could operate in higher winds than a VTVL. I can't think of an obvious reason for that. Admittedly, I don't know a lot about aircraft operations.


On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Peter Fairbrother <zenadsl6186@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:zenadsl6186@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


    Yes - however there are reasons to think a WWJ (with pilots) would
    have a faster turnaround.

    First of all, weather - it does seem evident that a WWJ can
    operate in higher winds than a VTVL.



Other related posts: