[arachne] Re: Alternate browser usages
- From: "Ron Clarke" <ariadne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: arachne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:46:13 +1000
Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!
Hi Folks,
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:24:36 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Sorry... I should have been more plain.
> What I mean is to run unzip.exe without the -d d:\ command line options.
> However.... I havwe a feeling that the DOS version of unzip.exe
> is still not going to do the job for you.
> I think that you may need to use WinZip to extract zipslack.zip
> so that it can re-build the LFNs and the very deeply nested dior
> stucture.
> As to FAT16 vs FAT32...... no problem there.
> The problem simply seems to be the incapability of LFN and deep dirs
> via 'pure DOS' programs.
And yet, I was able to make a zipslack installation just fine with
pkunzip v2.50 on a FAT16 system. But I was using zipslack.zip from
Slackware 4.0 - not the same one Greg is having so much fun with.
Regards,
Ron
Ron Clarke
AUSREG Consultancy http://www.ausreg.com
Tadpole Tunes http://www.tadpoletunes.com
-- This mail was written by a user of the Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
Arachne at FreeLists
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --
Other related posts:
