[arachne] Re: Alternate browser usages

Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club!

On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:35:50 +1030, Greg Mayman wrote:

> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:40:12 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:

>> Since you now have both unzip.exe and zipslack.zip in the root dir of d:
>> d:<enter>
>> cd \<enter>
>> unzip zipslack.zip<enter>

> That's what I said in my previous message:


Sorry... I should have been more plain.

What I mean is to run unzip.exe without the -d d:\ command line options.

However.... I havwe a feeling that the DOS version of unzip.exe
is still not going to do the job for you.

I think that you may need to use WinZip to extract zipslack.zip
so that it can re-build the LFNs and the very deeply nested dior
stucture.

As to FAT16 vs FAT32...... no problem there.

The problem simply seems to be the incapability of LFN and deep dirs
via 'pure DOS' programs.


-- 
 Glenn
 http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
 http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.table.html
                  Arachne at FreeLists                  
-- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --

Other related posts: