Hi all, I think that Ryan brings up a very important point here. Why are written descriptions so bad? Or, phrased slightly differently, why are they written so poorly? I know that it's certainly something that I struggle with, and if photos are better 95ish% of the time, then I'm not the only one. Some of the questions I'd like to bring up are what makes for a good write-up as well as what makes for being able to make a good write up? Is it enough to say that a bird belongs to a given order//family, or should those traits be explained as well? How much attention has really been paid to the bird itself? Are you learning what the bird actually looks/sounds like (be it shape, color, behavior, etc), or are you just recognizing it? As Ryan mentions, the advantage to photos is that not everyone describes or sees things the same way. Photos (or recordings) give the outside observer(s) a better connection to the subject matter. We also know that photos can be misleading, due to angle, light, behavior, etc, but some of that information can be provided as well to help reduce that. I tend to try to take photos because I know that my written descriptions are weak. Is this a crutch I'm leaning on? It's easy to look in a book, see what traits are pointed out there, and then go ahead and describe those characteristics in a write-up. How does one write a reliable write-up, that doesn't sound like it's taken directlly from a book (be it because a book was directly used or effectively memorized), yet the key points are still addressed? It seems to me that field notes are enormously important, yet I very rarely take them. I'm not sure if it's because I'm too lazy and don't want to take that much time to do so, or if I'm too daunted at the vast task of attempting to write down a myriad of information about one bird, let alone trying to do so for multiple birds. Is my lack of artistic ability such a significant handicap because I'm unable to make accurate sketches and may not be able to process and absorb color and shape behavior well enough? Is my vocabulary also limiting me, because I used choppy instead of snappy? Are there some sample write-ups available for viewing somewhere? Better still, sample write-ups with explanations as to why it is good or bad? What are some of the most frustrating phrases? I have to imagine only getting information like "good view" or "great light" could be very irritating (my apologies for past uses of such simple (for me) and frustrating (for the reviewer) descriptions). Some bad descriptions seem fairly self-explanatorily bad. Look at page such-and-such in so-and-so's book and it looked just like that. Are there others that people seem to think are good descriptions that really aren't? I find that I'm always frustrated when my records are not accepted. However, it's not because "the grumble, grumble records committee didn't accept my record" or because "the stupid e-bird reviewer hates me," but because I couldn't write well enough to convince a group of very experienced birders that I saw the bird I claimed. Especially if I had "good looks" and "great light", one would hope that I should be able to provide the salient points as to why the species is what I say it is, yet sometimes that's not always the case. I suppose that's the beauty of birding though, is that there's always more to learn and people to help you learn it. My apologies if this is too rambly/incoherent. Good birding, Ted Keyel Sun Prairie, Dane County On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Ryan Brady <ryanbrady10@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > Sorry Al but photos are better than written descriptions 95-99 times out > of 100. Same as seeing the bird in the field? Absolutely not. But > conclusive in many, many, many more cases than written descriptions. And > the alternative is no photo, which yields zero accountability and little > opportunity for anyone to advance on difficult identifications. > > Sorry for the mini-rant, this is one of my pet peeves. > > Ryan Brady > Washburn, Bayfield County, WI > http://www.pbase.com/rbrady > > > From: alschirmacher@xxxxxxxx > > To: wisbirdn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [wisb] Re: Warbler Quiz > > Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:40:15 -0500 > > > > While I enjoy warbler quizzes (far more than empid quizzes!), this > series of photos brings a discussion point to mind: > > > > * Relying on photos as the ultimate identification tool is nearly as > fraught with peril as a written description. > > > > Yet it is so tempting! > > > > Al Schirmacher > > Columbus, WI temporarily > > Princeton, MN again next week > > > > PS Many thanks to Wisbirders for their recommendations, directions and > encouragement during my return to Wisconsin. Had the opportunity to get > away on occasion to a variety of spots from Horicon to Madison, resulting > in 100+ birds and 30+ butterflies, including a life bird, two state birds > and six year birds. Mom passed yesterday, anticipate returning to Minnesota > Sunday. > > > > Special thanks to Peter Fissel, he's a trooper! > > > > #################### > > You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin > Birding Network (Wisbirdn). > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: > //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn > > To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: > //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn > > Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn > > > > #################### > You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin > Birding Network (Wisbirdn). > To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: > //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn > To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: > //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn > Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn > > > #################### You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin Birding Network (Wisbirdn). To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn