[windows2000] Re: Sus and apache?
- From: "Charles R. Buchanan" <crbgfblab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:36:55 -0700
Darn, I really did mean to add that. Thanks!
>-----Original Message-----
>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jonathan Chan
>Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:30 PM
>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [windows2000] Re: Sus and apache?
>
>
>
>At 02:25 PM 10/11/2002, you wrote:
>
>>I hear people (mostly Linux users) say how un-secure Windows is
>out the box,
>>and that for the most part is true, however, Unic/Linux and so
>forth is more
>>secure because dummies like me that doesn't have a clue, can't
>get the thing
>>running in the first place, thus, if it isn't running, wouldn't
>you say that
>>is REALLY secure? LOL!!! :-)
>
>
>*nices are more secure out of the box because not everything is enabled by
>default.
>
>
>==================================
>To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
>mode or view archives use the below link.
>
>http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
>
---
It's lights OUT for you viruses!
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.401 / Virus Database: 226 - Release Date: 10/9/2002
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
