[windows2000] Re: Sus and apache?
- From: Aaron Dokey <adokey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:08:42 -0400
I've got a domain controller that has been up for 210 days (NT4)... It's
actually a P75. Heh, but it doesn't do much.
I've also got an exchange server that has been up for 108 days and counting
(NT4)... And, against all recommendations I've got a couple of citrix
servers that have been up for 151 days and 80 days (Win2k).
It's not that Windows NT/2k isn't stable if maintained right, it's just
easier for people to screw up. I completely agree with the previous
comments about intimidating the people who would do the damage.
-Aaron
-----------------------
Aaron Dokey - MIS
Reid Tool Supply
2265 Black Creek Rd.
Muskegon, MI 49444
(231) 777-3951
(231) 767-3772 (Direct)
-----------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Alfonso Lopez de Ayala [mailto:alopezdeayala@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:59 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Sus and apache?
Chillisoft has been around for years (at least since ASP 2). I've seen
Apache servers running VBScript/JScript ASP applications thru Chillisoft
up constantly for over 240 days (no reboots) -- that's almost a year!
How long is the longest you've ever had a Windows machine (production
server) running without a reboot?
Does anyone know of anything for ASP.Net in Apache? I must admit that
VisualStudio.Net is the nicest object-oriented web development
environment I've ever seen (even though .Net is a 1.0 technology) -- if
you could just compile those ASP.Net pages for an Apache environment
it'd be a delight.
Isn't NASDAQ run on IIS?
Alfonso
-----Original Message-----
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Combis
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:47 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Sus and apache?
I agree Ray. =20
One of my friends used Apache only at his last job. He would rant and =
rave about how much better it was than W2K. Well he ended up doing some
=
consulting for my company (coincidentally).......and we are a W2K shop =
so he needed to learn about W2K....Let's just say he was amazed at how =
quick tasks can be accomplished and he is now a convert. Bottom line is
=
W2K comes working right out of the box, but if you don't know what you =
are doing, you can thoroughly screw it up very easily. Where as Apache
=
is initially much harder to set up, thus deterring much of the crowd who
=
would screw it up. Just my opinion....
-----Original Message-----
From: Costanzo, Ray [mailto:rcostanzo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:39 PM
To: 'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Sus and apache?
Ha! I think what Alfonso means to say is "I never pay any attention to
=
what
Ray says on this list. If I did, I'd realize that he HATES wizards and
=
all
that other stuff that stupifies things and that he does everything at =
the
command prompt when possible."
But, yeah, that's not to say that I know anything about Apache. I =
don't.
But I still know what I know about IIS! And any time anyone says 2000 =
or
IIS or whatever is unstable, that means that the person has only =
experienced
servers that were setup by jackasses.
Ray at work
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alfonso Lopez de Ayala [mailto:alopezdeayala@xxxxxxxxxxxx]=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Hmmm... I think Ray means to say: "I don't know anything=20
> about Apache or
> any other web server, plus if I use software with no GUIs or Wizards I
> might actually understand what is really going on, and thus I wouldn't
> need to be employed for so many hours just to keep the web server
up"=20
>=20
> :):):)
>=20
> Alfonso
>=20
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
