[tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates and the precautionary principal

  • From: "Bob Landman" <rlandman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:54:56 -0400

works for me still - black hole must be very small and in your computer :-)! 

-----Original Message-----
From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:40 PM
To: Bob Landman
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates and the 
precautionary principal

I tried that link and it did not work;  "The page could not be found."

Evidently it vanished into a Black Hole.

True Irony.

Steve Smith

BL> Great explanation at YouTube
BL> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rk8Vr00EBHA
BL> Michio Kaku: Mini Black Holes and the Large Hadron Collider

BL> Bob Landman
BL>  

BL> -----Original Message-----
BL> From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
BL> [mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Smith
BL> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 8:17 PM
BL> To: John Burke
BL> Cc: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
BL> Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates 
BL> and the precautionary principal

BL> John and all,

BL> Please don't worry about this.

BL> Stephen Hawking won a prize from the Gravitational Research 
BL> Foundation in 1973 for a landmark paper proving that black holes 
BL> radiate, and the smaller ones radiate faster, and the radiation rate 
BL> increases very rapidly as they get smaller.

BL> That, incidentally, is why there are not any quantum black holes.
BL> They are about as unstable as you could get, self-converting into 
BL> radiation in one Chronon (a quantum unit of time.  I have no idea 
BL> how small it is, but it's very small).

BL> The mass-equivalence of 17 Tev is more than twelve orders of 
BL> magnitude below a microgram, according to my "The Energy Level of 
BL> Things" on my wall here.  I could have calculated it but it's been a long 
day and this was faster.

BL> Even if we could make a 100Kg black hole, we would need something 
BL> almost twenty orders of magnitude bigger than that piddly little
BL> Large Hadron Collider.   Avogadro's number looks about right.

BL> Relax.  Those folks publishing that paper evidently never read 
BL> Hawking's paper, or looked at the energy level of things.

BL> Steve Smith

BL> ps:  John, please forward to those other lists;  I'm not subscribed to them.

JB>> Just a little food for thought.

JB>> While we are busily falling into line with materials policy 
JB>> dictates from Europe based on the precautionary principal, I 
JB>> thought you might find it interesting to see what is taking place 
JB>> in Europe with total disregard for the same principal.

JB>> As you are probably aware the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) project 
JB>> blew up last year during commissioning. The collider is able to 
JB>> collide particles with energy levels up to I believe 17TeV, and is 
JB>> in the process of being repaired prior to re-commissioning.

JB>> At this power the scientists involved are expecting to find new 
JB>> particles and are also anticipating the production of 5 dimensional 
JB>> black holes as an outcome.

JB>> The attached reference link is to the high energy particle physics 
JB>> site. The paper entitled "On the Possibility of Catastrophic Black 
JB>> Hole Growth in the Warped Brane-World Scenario at the LHC" 
JB>> Describes the "likely" size of such black holes and assures that they are 
not liable to reach a "critical mass"
JB>> of 100Kg - at which point presumably everything in the area would 
JB>> be sucked into said black hole swiftly followed by the rest of the 
JB>> solar system.....they did not probe that scenario...

JB>> Here are the links:

JB>> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0901/0901.2948v2.pdf

JB>> and...

JB>> http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.2948


JB>> No I am not joking this is a real paper on a real site - and I for 
JB>> one just hope that their assumptions and math about particles they 
JB>> have never seen are correct.

JB>> So much for the "precautionary principal"!

JB>> John Burke






BL> --
BL> Best regards,
BL>  Steve                            mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

BL>  www.consultingscientist.us

BL> http://www.pickensplan.com/








--
Best regards,
 Steve                            mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 www.consultingscientist.us

http://www.pickensplan.com/





Other related posts: