[tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates and the precautionary principal

  • From: Steve Smith <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Dr Mark Vaughan <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:30:41 -0700


DMV> I thought the black hole was in our banking systems:-)


There's clearly more than one.


DMV> One does wonder though who the hell regulates these people.


Regulates?  Surely, you jest.


DMV> We built nuclear bombs and get extremely upset when other countries try to
DMV> make their own applying quite aggressive pressure to stop them.


Can't hardly blame us for that. They would do the same if tables were
turned.


DMV> We have genetic experimentation which has been banned in most countries
DMV> because of the possible outcomes.


Those possible outcomes are now clearly visible. Said genetic
experiments have resulted in amoral executives magnetically drawn to
financial institutions, there to take root, flourish and prosper,
consuming the innards to their own benefit while wasting the
remainder, genetically programmed to seek government bailout when
their pupation period is finished and they are ready to emerge and
take flight, seeking another host.


DMV> Even Einstein's research papers were all removed and locked away.


Any idea if he had written any thought-experiments about genetics, or
finance, or (worse) about both?


DMV> The possible outcome of this is more than worrying but no authority seems
DMV> bothered.


Said authorities are similarly the outcome of aforesaid genetic
experiments, programmed not to attack an ally.

Steve Smith

DMV> Regs Mark



DMV> Dr. Mark Vaughan Ph'D., B.Eng. M0VAU
DMV> Managing Director
DMV> Vaughan Industries Ltd., reg in UK no 2561068
DMV> Water Care Technology Ltd, reg in UK no 4129351
DMV> Addr Unit3, Sydney House, Blackwater, Truro, Cornwall, TR4 8HH UK.
DMV> Phone/Fax 44 (0) 1872 561288
DMV> RSGB DRM111 (Cornwall)

DMV> -----Original Message-----
DMV> From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
DMV> [mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Landman
DMV> Sent: 21 June 2009 16:55
DMV> To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
DMV> Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates and 
the
DMV> precautionary principal

DMV> works for me still - black hole must be very small and in your computer 
:-)!


DMV> -----Original Message-----
DMV> From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
DMV> [mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Smith
DMV> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:40 PM
DMV> To: Bob Landman
DMV> Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates and 
the
DMV> precautionary principal

DMV> I tried that link and it did not work;  "The page could not be found."

DMV> Evidently it vanished into a Black Hole.

DMV> True Irony.

DMV> Steve Smith

BL>> Great explanation at YouTube
BL>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rk8Vr00EBHA
BL>> Michio Kaku: Mini Black Holes and the Large Hadron Collider

BL>> Bob Landman
BL>>  

BL>> -----Original Message-----
BL>> From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
BL>> [mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Smith
BL>> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 8:17 PM
BL>> To: John Burke
BL>> Cc: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
BL>> Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates 
BL>> and the precautionary principal

BL>> John and all,

BL>> Please don't worry about this.

BL>> Stephen Hawking won a prize from the Gravitational Research 
BL>> Foundation in 1973 for a landmark paper proving that black holes 
BL>> radiate, and the smaller ones radiate faster, and the radiation rate 
BL>> increases very rapidly as they get smaller.

BL>> That, incidentally, is why there are not any quantum black holes.
BL>> They are about as unstable as you could get, self-converting into 
BL>> radiation in one Chronon (a quantum unit of time.  I have no idea 
BL>> how small it is, but it's very small).

BL>> The mass-equivalence of 17 Tev is more than twelve orders of 
BL>> magnitude below a microgram, according to my "The Energy Level of 
BL>> Things" on my wall here.  I could have calculated it but it's been a
DMV> long day and this was faster.

BL>> Even if we could make a 100Kg black hole, we would need something 
BL>> almost twenty orders of magnitude bigger than that piddly little
BL>> Large Hadron Collider.   Avogadro's number looks about right.

BL>> Relax.  Those folks publishing that paper evidently never read 
BL>> Hawking's paper, or looked at the energy level of things.

BL>> Steve Smith

BL>> ps:  John, please forward to those other lists;  I'm not subscribed to
DMV> them.

JB>>> Just a little food for thought.

JB>>> While we are busily falling into line with materials policy 
JB>>> dictates from Europe based on the precautionary principal, I 
JB>>> thought you might find it interesting to see what is taking place 
JB>>> in Europe with total disregard for the same principal.

JB>>> As you are probably aware the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) project 
JB>>> blew up last year during commissioning. The collider is able to 
JB>>> collide particles with energy levels up to I believe 17TeV, and is 
JB>>> in the process of being repaired prior to re-commissioning.

JB>>> At this power the scientists involved are expecting to find new 
JB>>> particles and are also anticipating the production of 5 dimensional 
JB>>> black holes as an outcome.

JB>>> The attached reference link is to the high energy particle physics 
JB>>> site. The paper entitled "On the Possibility of Catastrophic Black 
JB>>> Hole Growth in the Warped Brane-World Scenario at the LHC" 
JB>>> Describes the "likely" size of such black holes and assures that they
DMV> are not liable to reach a "critical mass"
JB>>> of 100Kg - at which point presumably everything in the area would 
JB>>> be sucked into said black hole swiftly followed by the rest of the 
JB>>> solar system.....they did not probe that scenario...

JB>>> Here are the links:

JB>>> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0901/0901.2948v2.pdf

JB>>> and...

JB>>> http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.2948


JB>>> No I am not joking this is a real paper on a real site - and I for 
JB>>> one just hope that their assumptions and math about particles they 
JB>>> have never seen are correct.

JB>>> So much for the "precautionary principal"!

JB>>> John Burke






BL>> --
BL>> Best regards,
BL>>  Steve                            mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

BL>>  www.consultingscientist.us

BL>> http://www.pickensplan.com/








DMV> --
DMV> Best regards,
DMV>  Steve                            mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

DMV>  www.consultingscientist.us

DMV> http://www.pickensplan.com/










-- 
Best regards,
 Steve                            mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 www.consultingscientist.us

http://www.pickensplan.com/


Other related posts: