[tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates and the precautionary principal
- From: "John Burke" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:06:54 -0700
And that is the point I was trying to make on the thread.
Having banned lead in solder without any scientific evidence or testing of
whether it was an issue or not, how in the World can they let CERN loose
making black holes based on math that will be PROVEN if the particles they
generate work out.
In effect the result is a complete unknown as there is no math in the world
that you can run the numbers on without making all of the assumptions about
the outcome of the experiment - and if the outcome does not fit the math it
will be ways too late to go back over the numbers.
Like I said originally - what happened to the precautionary principal?
John Burke
(408) 515 4992
-----Original Message-----
From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dr Mark Vaughan
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 6:42 AM
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates and the
precautionary principal
I was more thinking some unqualified idiot in EU Gov banned our good solder
when they didn't really have a clue.
AND
Why hasn't some similar idiot in EU come along banned black holes.
Then think that the first judgement isn't cataclysmic, but despite Cerns
study, where there are many assumptions, and wide uncertainty factors if you
make a mistake were really in trouble.
I am really surprised public or political fear hasn't intervened
Regs Mark
Dr. Mark Vaughan Ph'D., B.Eng. M0VAU
Managing Director
Vaughan Industries Ltd., reg in UK no 2561068
Water Care Technology Ltd, reg in UK no 4129351
Addr Unit3, Sydney House, Blackwater, Truro, Cornwall, TR4 8HH UK.
Phone/Fax 44 (0) 1872 561288
RSGB DRM111 (Cornwall)
-----Original Message-----
From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cronk, William CIV
USA AMC
Sent: 23 June 2009 10:54
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates and the
precautionary principal
Okay, I can related a black hole to tin-wiskers!
First someone needs to develop an MEMs device which contains a micro
black hole held within a stable magnetic bottle with a lid on it. The
purpose of the lid is to allow the surrounding circuitry to open and
close it on demand. At timed intervals the lid is opened which then will
draw in all developing tin-whiskers for disposal. There is another added
benefit, such as on a circuit card installed in a computer it could also
help control the dust bunnies in the computer case.
Nuf' Said.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rod
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 3:49 PM
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: The compliance with EU materials dictates and
the precautionary principal
On 21 Jun 2009, at 20:04, Dr Mark Vaughan wrote:
> I thought the black hole was in our banking systems:-)
>
> One does wonder though who the hell regulates these people...
>
> The possible outcome of this is more than worrying but no authority
> seems bothered.
To be perfectly honest, it is not worrying at all, the physics is
straightforward. Even the fundamentalists have faith in their God.
This discussion is off-topic, straying into areas in which you may not
be competent, and threatens to undermine the credibility of the main
tin-whiskers issue, in which I believe strongly.
regards, Rod
rod.dalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
