Hello Vinu, not exactly, only as long as you think about VSS as fixed potential. As I mentioned I think both are equal designed ... so you can get noise on both VDD or VSS. And both will be transferred equally to VTT ... But as I mentioned .. I think this is more a question of design philosophy ... Hermann Our next Events: ================ "Open the Black Box of Memory" Seminar on 09/10. October 2012 Check our website or contact us for details EKH - EyeKnowHow Hermann Ruckerbauer www.EyeKnowHow.de Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Veilchenstrasse 1 94554 Moos Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 schrieb Vinu Arumugham: > Hermann, > > > "Nevertheless I prefer to do a decoupling to both VDD and VSS." > > If you decouple VTT to both VDD and VSS, you create a AC voltage divider > between VDD/VSS and connect it to VTT. So any noise on VDD w.r.t VSS will be > divided in half and be injected on to VTT. Decoupling to VSS or VDD alone > would avoid this noise injection. Do you agree? > > Thanks, > Vinu > > > > On 06/08/2012 10:14 AM, Hermann Ruckerbauer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> yes, Vinu's explanation is very good! >> Just one comment: VTT is just between VDD and GND, so this would be no >> reason to decouple to VDD. The real issue is the referencing on the DIMM >> (which comes from the limited number of supply pins on the DIMM connector) >> >> Nevertheless I prefer to do a decoupling to both VDD and VSS. >> This is also some kind of philosophy. Some people think that VSS is a >> stable potential, while VDD is something unstable .. I think both should >> be handled with the same care. But this means, that both might have >> noise (seen in reference to some imaginary solid and fixed potential). >> Based on this "philosophy" i prefer to have e. g. two same size >> capacitors to VDD and GND compared to two different sized capacitors to >> GND (or VDD for CA). >> >> But thats just my way of looking into any "stable" potential ... >> >> Hermann >> >> Our next Events: >> ================ >> >> "Open the Black Box of Memory" >> Seminar on 09/10. October 2012 >> >> Check our website or contact us for details >> >> EKH - EyeKnowHow >> Hermann Ruckerbauer >> www.EyeKnowHow.de >> Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Veilchenstrasse 1 >> 94554 Moos >> Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 >> Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 >> Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 >> >> >> schrieb Vinu Arumugham: >>> My understanding is that on the DIMM, DQ routing is referenced to a VSS >>> plane and CA routing is referenced to a VDD plane. Therefore VrefCA is >>> bypassed to VDD and VrefDQ is bypassed to VSS. Since VTT is used to >>> terminate CA, it is also bypassed to VDD. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Vinu >>> >>> On 06/07/2012 11:29 PM, Tesla wrote: >>>> Hi, experts >>>> I read the standard "DDR3 SDRAM Unbuffered DIMM Design Specification" >>>> On the page 32, it states three kinds of decoupling for >>>> VTT,Vref_DQ,Vref_CApower rail: >>>> 1 VTT, Minimum of one decoupling capacitor to VDD per every two termination >>>> resistors >>>> 2 Vref_CA,Minimum of one decoupling capacitor to VDD per DRAM >>>> 3 Vref_DQ,Minimum of one decoupling capacitor to VSS per DRAM. >>>> >>>> Confusion: >>>> Why VTT decoupling capacitor to VDD not VSS(usually GND)? will this >>>> increase noise coupling between VTT and VDD? >>>> Vref_CA and Vref_DQ has same function as the reference voltage for SSTL-15. >>>> Vref_CA decoupling capacitor connected to VDD, but the Vref_DQ connected >>>> to VSS. >>>> >>>> I think decoupling capacitors of all above power rails should be connected >>>> to VSS and corresponding power rail net, this will be better decoupled. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Tesla >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>>> >>>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>>> >>>> For help: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>>> >>>> >>>> List forum is accessible at: >>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >>>> >>>> List archives are viewable at: >>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>>> >>>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> >>> List forum is accessible at: >>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List forum is accessible at: >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu