[SI-LIST] Re: Vref_DQ Vref_CA VTT decoupling in DDR3 DIMM

  • From: Tesla <emcesd@xxxxxxx>
  • To: sen.velmurugan@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:41:58 +0800 (CST)


Hi, Sen
 
Thanks.
 
You provide another point of view.

Tesla.

At 2012-06-13 00:55:06,"Sen Velmurugan" <sen.velmurugan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Corrected/Updated version...
>
>On 6/11/2012 6:38 PM, Sen Velmurugan wrote:
>> Statement: VTT, Minimum of one decoupling capacitor to VDD per every 
>> two termination resistors
>>
>> Question: Why VTT decoupling capacitor to VDD not VSS(usually GND)? 
>> will this increase noise coupling between VTT and VDD?
>>
>> Ans: Here the answer is hiding in the requirement "per every two 
>> termination resistor" , the fact is VDDQ is "decoupled" w.r. to VTT 
>> instead of VSS. The reason is When high side mosfet of the buffer is  
>> turned ON, for logic HI, the current flow is from VDDQ to mosfet to 
>> Termination Resistor to VTT power supply. Signal is switched w.r.t. 
>> VTT,  So we need to decouple the Buffer's VDDQ pin to VTT, not to VSS.
>> For logic LOW, the current flow from VTT --  Termination Resistor  --- 
>> low side mosfet to VSS is less inductive.
>>
>> Goal is to dump the noise to signalling reference right ?, there is no 
>> worry of noise coupling between VTT and VDDQ due this decaps.
>>
>> Decoupling Vref depends on how Vref is generated, decoupled usually 
>> w.r.t GND. There is also a idea about connecting a cap to VDD from 
>> Vref.  So any variation in the VDD is tracked by Vref. Here the need 
>> and size of cap matters and need to be ascertained during DVT.
>>
>> In Tesla' situation it is better to ask DRAM vendor, they know their 
>> internal buffers read circuit implementation.
>> May be Vref w.r.t to +ve or -ve i/p of opAmp.  I feel this requirement 
>> is DRAM driven than a layout driven choice.
>> As matter of fact, any layout recommendation from vendor data sheet 
>> should not be blindly followed and situation varies.
>>
>> As far as noise on the Vref due to dual(voltage divider) caps is a 
>> "past" event, in the sense the data is latched w.r.t to DQS clock and 
>> Vref after all SSO is complete and lot of time has elapsed(half data 
>> period). So only a large droop on VDDQ can be transferred to Vref with 
>> large cap only, a small cap won't pass the low freq event.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sen
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
>List forum  is accessible at:
>               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
>
>List archives are viewable at:     
>               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> 
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>  
>


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: