Hi, Sen Thanks. You provide another point of view. Tesla. At 2012-06-13 00:55:06,"Sen Velmurugan" <sen.velmurugan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Corrected/Updated version... > >On 6/11/2012 6:38 PM, Sen Velmurugan wrote: >> Statement: VTT, Minimum of one decoupling capacitor to VDD per every >> two termination resistors >> >> Question: Why VTT decoupling capacitor to VDD not VSS(usually GND)? >> will this increase noise coupling between VTT and VDD? >> >> Ans: Here the answer is hiding in the requirement "per every two >> termination resistor" , the fact is VDDQ is "decoupled" w.r. to VTT >> instead of VSS. The reason is When high side mosfet of the buffer is >> turned ON, for logic HI, the current flow is from VDDQ to mosfet to >> Termination Resistor to VTT power supply. Signal is switched w.r.t. >> VTT, So we need to decouple the Buffer's VDDQ pin to VTT, not to VSS. >> For logic LOW, the current flow from VTT -- Termination Resistor --- >> low side mosfet to VSS is less inductive. >> >> Goal is to dump the noise to signalling reference right ?, there is no >> worry of noise coupling between VTT and VDDQ due this decaps. >> >> Decoupling Vref depends on how Vref is generated, decoupled usually >> w.r.t GND. There is also a idea about connecting a cap to VDD from >> Vref. So any variation in the VDD is tracked by Vref. Here the need >> and size of cap matters and need to be ascertained during DVT. >> >> In Tesla' situation it is better to ask DRAM vendor, they know their >> internal buffers read circuit implementation. >> May be Vref w.r.t to +ve or -ve i/p of opAmp. I feel this requirement >> is DRAM driven than a layout driven choice. >> As matter of fact, any layout recommendation from vendor data sheet >> should not be blindly followed and situation varies. >> >> As far as noise on the Vref due to dual(voltage divider) caps is a >> "past" event, in the sense the data is latched w.r.t to DQS clock and >> Vref after all SSO is complete and lot of time has elapsed(half data >> period). So only a large droop on VDDQ can be transferred to Vref with >> large cap only, a small cap won't pass the low freq event. >> >> Thanks >> Sen >------------------------------------------------------------------ >To unsubscribe from si-list: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >For help: >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > >List forum is accessible at: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > >List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu