Statement: VTT, Minimum of one decoupling capacitor to VDD per every two termination resistors Question: Why VTT decoupling capacitor to VDD not VSS(usually GND)? will this increase noise coupling between VTT and VDD? Ans: Here the answer is hiding in the requirement "per every two termination resistor" , the fact is VDDQ is "decoupled" w.r. to VTT instead of VSS. The reason is When high side mosfet of the buffer is turned ON, for logic HI, the current flow is from VDDQ to mosfet to Termination Resistor to VTT power supply. Signal is switched w.r.t. VTT, So we need to decouple the Buffer's VDDQ pin to VTT, not to VDD. No need for the decap btw Buffer's VSS to VTT , because VSS is much more robust than VDDQ to supply necessary instantaneous current for logic LOW. Goal is to dump the noise to reference right, there is no worry of noise coupling between VTT and VDDQ Decoupling Vref depends on how Vref is generated, decoupled usually w.r.t GND. There is also a idea about connecting a cap to VDD from Vref. So any variation in the VDD is tracked by Vref. Here the need and size of cap matters and need to be ascertained during DVT. In Tesla' situation it is better to ask DRAM vendor, they know their internal buffers read circuit implementation. May be Vref w.r.t to +ve or -ve i/p of opAmp. I feel this requirement is DRAM driven than a layout driven choice. As matter of fact, any layout recommendation from vendor data sheet should not be blindly followed and situation varies. As far as noise on the Vref due to dual caps is a "past" event, in the sense the data is latched w.r.t to DQS clock and Vref after all SSO is complete and lot of time has elapsed(half data period). So only a large droop on VDDQ can be transferred to Vref with large cap only, a small cap won't pass the low freq event. Thanks Sen ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu