I didn't know how that was going to look after passing through the server ... This may be a little better. Paste it into a text editor to get all of the columns to line up. (Sorry ... This is all in mils ... If you download the eval software, it's easy to toggle back and forth between mils and microns.) Lyr Description Lyr Name Dk(Er) T S Width Zo Zdiff Soldermask 3.3 0.5 1 Signal Top 1.2 12 6.5 52 99 Prepreg 4.0 4 2 Plane ----- GND ------------- 1.2 Core 4.0 6 3 Signal Inner 3 1.2 12 4.5 52 101 Prepreg 4.0 8 4 Plane ----- VCC ------------- 1.2 Core 4.0 3.0 << INTERPLANE CAPACITANCE 5 Plane ----- GND ------------- 1.2 Prepreg 4.0 8 6 Signal Inner 6 1.2 12 4.5 52 101 Core 4.0 6 7 Plane ----- VDD ------------- 1.2 Prepreg 4.0 8 8 Signal Inner 8 1.2 12 4.5 52 101 Core 4.0 6 9 Plane ----- GND ------------- 1.2 Prepreg 4.0 4 10 Signal Bottom 1.2 12 6.5 52 99 Soldermask 3.3 0.5 Total Board Thickness=61.4 mil Differential Signals: Zdiff=90 ohms Layer Spacing Width Zo Zdiff 1 12 7.5 48.27 91.74 3 12 5.5 47.53 92.26 6 12 5.5 47.53 92.26 8 12 5.5 47.53 92.26 10 12 7.5 48.27 91.74 -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill Hargin (In-Circuit Design) Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:55 AM To: hitheshn@xxxxxxxxx; 'Nobuyuki Kunito' Cc: 'SI-List' Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: PCB thickness Hi Hithesh: There are a number of issues with your stackup; and I believe that all of them can be remedied by going to 10 layers, and adding 2 more planes. Instead of doing what my wife wanted me to do this Saturday morning, I decided to play with your stackup ... - Impedance: With your current stackup, I agree with your fab house, in the sense that there's no place to add board thickness while maintaining target impedances. (Not enough layers.) - Board Thickness: Any particular reason you're targeting 1.6mm (62mils)? If you're not dealing with an edge connector that needs a 1.6mm thickness, there would need to be a compelling reason to worry about it. I realize that some fabs have tooling that's all set up for 62mils, and that they may charge more to - Asymmetry: Did your fab house mention that your stackup is asymmetrical? They should have mentioned that, in addition to the thickness/impedance discussion. Asymmetrical stackups can lead to warping; and warping can lead to open circuits at vias, for example. - Educational stuff: Lee Ritchey talks about all of the above in his "Right the First Time" books. I put on a webinar series that covers all of this, as well. You can sign up for it on http://www.icd.com.au/Webinars-PCB-Stackup-Technology-Series.html It's a bit unusual to see a board with 5 signal layers and only 3 reference planes. For the small cost of going to 10 layers (5 signals; 5 planes), you can improve signal integrity, crosstalk, power distribution, and EMI - probably saving yourself a lot of headaches down the road. Based on all of this, and your comment about USB and DDR2 signals, I would recommend the following stackup (Im playing with an ASCII-output capability for our Stackup Planner tool; paste into a text editor to make it more readable ... If you want to visualize this better, download our [free] eval software from http://www.icd.com.au/FX.html, and I'll send you the before/after files for your stackup): Lyr Description Lyr Name Matl Type Dk(Er) Thickness Spacing Width Zo Zdiff Soldermask Dielectric 3.3 0.5 1 Signal Top Conductive 1.2 12 6.5 51.99 98.74 Prepreg Dielectric 4.0 4 2 Plane ----- GND ----- Conductive -------- 1.2 Core Dielectric 4.0 6 3 Signal Inner 3 Conductive 1.2 12 4.5 51.96 100.6 Prepreg Dielectric 4.0 8 4 Plane ----- VCC ----- Conductive -------- 1.2 Core Dielectric 4.0 3.0 <<<<< INTERPLANE CAPACITANCE (FOR SSO) 5 Plane ----- GND ----- Conductive -------- 1.2 Prepreg Dielectric 4.0 8 6 Signal Inner 6 Conductive 1.2 12 4.5 51.96 100.6 Core Dielectric 4.0 6 7 Plane ----- VDD ----- Conductive -------- 1.2 Prepreg Dielectric 4.0 8 8 Signal Inner 8 Conductive 1.2 12 4.5 51.96 100.6 Core Dielectric 4.0 6 9 Plane ----- GND ----- Conductive -------- 1.2 Prepreg Dielectric 4.0 4 10 Signal Bottom Conductive 1.2 12 6.5 51.99 98.74 Soldermask Dielectric 3.3 0.5 Total Board Thickness=61.4 mil Differential Signals: Zdiff=90 ohms Layer Spacing Width Zo Zdiff 1 12 7.5 48.27 91.74 3 12 5.5 47.53 92.26 6 12 5.5 47.53 92.26 8 12 5.5 47.53 92.26 10 12 7.5 48.27 91.74 * I assumed Dk=4.0. You would need to have more info on the materials on hand with your fab to refine the thicknesses and Dk's. Bill Hargin In-Circuit Design, USA Software & SI Simulation for High-Speed PCB Design (425) 301-4425 b.hargin@xxxxxxxxxx Skype: bill.hargin Online: www.icd.com.au -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hithesh Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 12:11 AM To: Nobuyuki Kunito Cc: SI-List Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: PCB thickness Hi, It's an 8 layer board. Stack up below L1: Fan out/GND L2: GND L3: Sig L4: PWR L5: Sig L6: Sig L7: GND L8: Fan out/GND The Cu thickness is 1oz on inner layers and 1oz finished thickness on outer layers. The Er/dielectric is left to the fab house. The board has high speed USB diff signals and DDR2 (133MHz). We use different Fab house for protos and production. The proto Fab house did not have any difficulty achieving board thickness and our impedance requirement. But the production Fab house wants to reduce PCB thickness and modify dielectric thickness. Regards -Hithesh On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Nobuyuki Kunito <kunito@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hithesh, > > First of all, please tell us: > How many layers the PCB have? > Layer construction and/or stack up (the thickness of metal, dielectric > material and Er of each dielectric material etc.) I am guessing that > the PCB fib house may change the dielectric material.. > > Please give us the information above first. > > Regards, > Nobuyuki Kunito. > The president of Debug Lab. > http://debuglab.jp > (Sorry, Japanese only now. English page will be coming soon) > > (2013/02/02 15:17), Hithesh wrote: > > Hi, > > What is the impact of changing PCB thickness? > > To cut a long story short, the PCB fab house we use said they can't > > meet our impedance requirement and achieve board thickness of 1.6mm. > > They have to reduce the board thickness to 1.13mm to meet impedance > > requirement. > > He did say they could achieve both when we sent them the stack up pdf. > But > > now they said they can't take decisions just based on stack up. > > > > Regards > > -Hithesh > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject > > field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > > List forum is accessible at: > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu