The answer to shipping clocks across flex: Don't do it if possible. Reconsider the system, perhaps distributed clocking would work, or even clock recovery from data. If you absolutely had to ship clock across flex, do it differentially on two layer flex. Next best would probably be two layer flex with ground plane under clock and really slow clock edges. Yes, it is likely to cause problems with emissions. Curt Some basics on flex: http://connectorwizard.com/reference/articles/pdfs/flex_webinar.pdf Curt McNamara, P.E. // senior electrical engineer=20 Logic Product Development 411 Washington Ave. N. Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55401 T // 612.436.5178 F // 612.672.9489 www.logicpd.com=20 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /=20 This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jeanpierrepoulin Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 3:04 PM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] How to properly simulate signal integrity across PCBs interconnected by Flex? Hello Gurus, I am attempting to correctly design the first time a system=20 consisting of five small PCBs interconnected by short (1-5 inch) Flex=20 cable. While most signals are single ended and of moderate speed (20- 80 Mhz and with most edges controlled by the driving strength of FPGA=20 drivers), I am particularly concerned about some clock signals that I=20 need to spread to all these PCBs and wish to properly simulate... 1. Is there a flex connector vendor in particular that publishes=20 quality IBIS model the simulating software will need? 2. What simulating software do you recommend as easiest to use for=20 this type of need? 3. Do you think usage of Flex cabling in this fashion would cause =20 problems during FCC certification? 4. Any good web site / publication you've seen on the subject of=20 signal integrity across Flex cabling? Any hint you could offer is greatly appreciated!! Jean-Pierre Poulin ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: =20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu