Hi folks thanks to everybody for your feedback Let me describe better my application! I have a backplane with one Digital_GND over one Analog_GND of course these 2 nets are separated each others, but due to big plane shape dimension I got resonance modes starting from 220 MHz I don't think I can use decoupling capacitor in this case, so I guess I can only work with plane shape dimension and dielectric thickness My idea is to move/shift at higher frequency these modes. I don't want to couples these low frequency modes to digital signals that operates at 400-800 Mbps Thanks for any further comments Regards Cris 2011/11/21 Brad Brim <bradb@xxxxxxxxxxx> > hi Steve, > > I did not say it failed to dampen a resonance, I only said it does not > serve > to eliminate the resonance. I am familiar with Chris's applications and in > many cases he may not be able to apply the commercially available thin > dielectrics, let alone one less than 5um thickness, as cited from Istvan's > paper. Our comments are each equally correct and equally applicable to > Chris. > > cheers, > -Brad > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of steve weir > > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 12:03 PM > > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Damping of Cavity-Mode Resonances in PCB > > > > Brad, thin dielectrics most definitely do suppress cavity > > modal resonances. They do so by reducing the Q. Inductance > > goes down, but skin resistance remains fixed, and for any dK > > and tangent loss coefficient dielectric loss increases. > > There are a number of papers out there that show these > > characteristics. Istvan published a paper circa > > 2004 that showed for dK of 4 and tangent loss of 0.02 that > > around 0.1 - > > 0.2 mils thickness, cavity Q falls to one. Already having > > served its > > primary purpose, an empty beer can still makes a terrific > > resonant cavity, very thin cavities are quite another matter. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Steve. > > On 11/21/2011 11:42 AM, Brad Brim wrote: > > > hi Chris, > > > > > > By "cavity modes" do you mean power plane resonances? If > > so, is your > > > objective to (a) drive down device impedance, (b) drive down > > > emissions, (c) both? Is your goal to only change plane shapes, > > > stackup, etc. or are you also able to modify decap/emicap > > placement and selection? > > > > > > You cannot eliminate all resonance from a plane cavity of > > electrically > > > large size with only shape or stackup changes. The modes will have > > > different spatial distribution as you change the shape but > > you cannot eliminate them. > > > As you remove plane cavity area you will reduce spectral > > mode density. > > > The big question is how much plane cavity are you able to > > eliminate? > > > Using thinner dielectrics does nothing to eliminate resonances. It > > > certainly raises capacitance but its most significant > > contribution is > > > to reduce inductance (not just for spreading but also for > > mounting caps). > > > > > > If you are trying to eliminate resonances by adding caps it is > > > interesting to note that the best solution is not a > > sequential process > > > such as: (1) simulate to find the first resonance peak, (2) > > add a cap > > > near the resonance peak, repeat (1-2). This process yields reduced > > > resonances. But if you are able to add multiple caps > > simultaneously by > > > considering broadband impedance across the entire PDN, then > > you find > > > better solutions with a smaller set of caps. > > > > > > cheers, > > > -Brad > > > Sigrity > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cristian Gozzi > > >> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 7:52 AM > > >> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> Subject: [SI-LIST] Damping of Cavity-Mode Resonances in PCB > > >> > > >> Hi SI expert > > >> I'm looking for a good article/paper that describe techniques to > > >> reduce or suppress cavity modes in PCB, just by working on plane > > >> shape dimension, pwr to gnd dilectric thickness etc. > > >> > > >> Thanks in advance for your suggestion > > >> > > >> regards > > >> Cris > > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the > > Subject field > > > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > > > For help: > > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > > http://www.si-list.net > > > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > > > > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Steve Weir > > IPBLOX, LLC > > 150 N. Center St. #211 > > Reno, NV 89501 > > www.ipblox.com > > > > (775) 299-4236 Business > > (866) 675-4630 Toll-free > > (707) 780-1951 Fax > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > http://www.si-list.net > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu