On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:38:16 -0700, Peter Argenziano wrote: > I'm not sure why you are concentrating on resolution and image size as > design criteria. Seems arbitrarily constrictive as all graphical elements > can be scaled. But raster graphics can only be realistically scaled downward. > Have a look at the brochure I put together: > > http://rotaryobs.org/rro/downloads/SAC_flyer.pdf > > It doesn't have the SAC logo or the map graphic, as I don't have those > elements. But it has all fonts embedded and the final PDF is only 25 kb in > size. Paul, I'm curious as to how you are creating your PDFs that they are > so large. All 3 of my viewer programs say that the two fonts are not embedded (the output from two doesn't look good). The third, acroread substitutes "Adobe San MM" for both fonts and looks OK. I use unicode characters in the text (en dash, left and right double-quotes come to mind). Fully embedding a font is about 250 KB in the PDF. Then I have 2 MB of images (PNG file sizes). When I changed one image from 700+ dpi to 450, the same size difference in the PNG file was seen in the PDF. I'm using Scribus to layout the pamphlet and create the PDF. > > I also noticed that the meeting calendar has two dates listed for June. Meeting have been scheduled for (about) four weeks apart. -Paul