Emmanuel B. and I mentioned the Fuji... there is some dispute relative to whether these lenses are great however... Eric Goldstein -- On 8/31/07, R.C.Booth <rcbooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I've been following this thread with interest as I've been playing with wide > angle lenses on a 2x3 Century Graphic. > > But if you can do with a 65mm lens, one ready-made solution is to get a Fuji > GW690 in any of the three versions that were made. > > These are certainly convenient with great lenses and pretty close to an > actual 6 x 9 format. > > RCB > > http://rcbooth.zenfolio.com/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mike Bischof > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:36 AM > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: 6 x 9 search > > > Jan, > After all the technical discussions ;-), let me give you some perspectives > from a user's point, as I have gone that route in the last couple of years > -- and yes, it does lead to LF photography with no shortage of opportunities > to blows lots of cash. As a result, my current favorite weapon is an Arca > Swiss 4x5 Field camera with a Rodenstock Apo-Sironar S 210, but that's a > different discussion :-D > > Back to the topic at hand. After considerable time with the 6x6 negatives > and slides from my Rolleiflex, I wanted to get something with a bigger (and > rectangular) negative, so my first choice was a Crown Graphic 23. Here are a > couple of notes on that camera (which I still own and love, but which > doesn't get a whole lot of use anymore, thanks to the Arca): > > 1) Relatively cheap and lightweight camera with good (and cheap) access to > multiple lenses. I still have the 101mm Ektar and the 80mm WA Ektar, both > are great lenses. > 2) With the proper sets of infinity stops (and good calibration), neither > lens really needs the rangefinder for focusing _landscapes_ since they > _will_ be shot at infinity. Of course, other shots will require focusing. > 3) For hand-held operations, focusing by groundglass is a PITA, but so is > composition. I always used my Crown Graphic tripod-mounted, but it is > possible to do handheld as well. For _landscapes_, I think the bigger issue > is composition, but if you are only using B&W, where you can crop during > printing (rather than slides, where that is less desirable), you could just > get the proper masks for the external viewfinder that is attached on top of > the (older?) Crown Graphics. They are not as accurate as in an SLR, but you > can just make sure that you are capturing the scene in general (also see > film flatness issues below). > 4) If you do buy a Crown Graphic, make sure you get one with a Graflock, so > you can use rollfilm holders. Since you are interested in 6x9, you want the > rollfilm holder that generates 8 shots out of a 120 roll (I think it's > called RH-8???). There are (at least) two versions, the newer ones have > additional rollers to achieve better (but not perfect) film flatness, but as > a result, the image is really more like 6x8 (one of mine was as small as > 56x72mm). The older ones do not have the rollers, are closer to 6x9, but > also have more film flatness issues. My approach was always to compose > generously, and then really only use the center 6x7 (or so) for printing. > 5) There are wider lenses than the 80mm WA Ektar for 6x9, but they will all > require you to "drop the bed" to avoid it showing up in your picture. As a > result, IMHO, _handheld_ composition is practically impossible. I had a 65mm > Angulon and a 47mm (Super?-) Angulon for a while, but even tripod-mounted it > was a PITA, and they never saw enough use (for me) to warrant keeping them. > > Incidentally, since I wanted to have a _handheld_ camera whenever I can't > use my Arca, I got a 6x9 folder about a year ago. Since I didn't want any > front-cell focusing camera (due to the well-known image quality issues, all > the Zeiss Ikons (unfortunately) were off the list. I ended up getting a > Voigtlander Bessa II, which had most of the things I wanted: > - good optics. I only got the Color-Skopar (=Tessar) version, but there is a > Color-Heliar and even a Apo-Lanthar version. although at _much_ higher > prices. > - coupled rangefinder > - not front-cell focusing -- the whole lens moves when focusing > I does have considerable film-flatness issues, but, again, the center potion > (about 6x7) is perfect, and the viewfinder isn't terrible accurate for > composition anyway. > > Feel free to contact me offline, if you have more questions. > > Cheers, > Mike > > > > > > Jan Decher <Jan.Decher@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Eric: > > > Very interested in a portable 6x9 folder, especially in one that can handle > a mild wideangle (60mm) so I can do panoramic landscapes on my expeditions. > Do you have web links for the Miniature Speed or Busch Pressman? Do they > have coupled rangefinders or will I have to resort to groundglas focusing by > taking the 6x9 cassette on and off? > I guess this is how people gradually slide into LF photography... > > > I picked up the Omega B7 today. It has two focusing tracks for a 50mm > Componon and a 3 1/2inch (90mm) Ektar, But only came with a 50mm EL > Omegar... > > > Thanks, > Jan > > > > On 30 Aug 2007, at 02:28, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote: > > My fav 69 shooters are a miniature Speed and > a Busch Pressman, from which I can hang any number of fine lenses. I > also think they have the edge over folders relative to film > flatness... > Eric Goldstein > > > > ________________________________ > Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! > FareChase. > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list