I would 2nd that. Night shots with nearly point sources of light make it really tricky to get any detail in those lights and pushing will make it much more so. ________________________________ From: Bob Younger <ryounger@xxxxxxxxx> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 7:59 AM Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Optimum results pushing 4x5 Tri-x 320 at 800 or 1600iso?? Bogdan, If it's a building, and nothing's moving, why not just rate it as you normally would. Night exposures are always a WAG anyway; with deep shadows and reciprocity, it's mostly just trying to get sufficient info on the film to develop. If you have a couple of nights left, perhaps the best thing to do is make a couple of exposures one night, process them; then make what adjustments you want to make on a second night. Bob Younger On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Bogdan Karasek <BKarasek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hello, > >Needless to say, I got all sorts of contrary opinions as to how high you can >push the iso of 4x5 TX 320asa and still get satisfactory results??? And what >developer will give those results? > >They are building a new super-hospital campus with several 10-12 story >buildings, not far from here, 15 minute walk. The sides are still open and >the work lights are left on at night. Quite the spectacle. I want to catch >this on the above mentioned 4x5 sheet film, before they close up the walls. > I'm using a Toyo 4x5 CF with a 127/7.7 Ektar in a Supermatic shutter and a >monopod. Lens standard set to infinity and use the viewfinder with the #4 >mask and three loaded Grafmatics. > >Any opinions dearly welcome. > >Cheers, >Bogdan >============================================================================================================= >To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your >account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) >and unsubscribe from there. >