[pure-silver] Re: Agfa Paper Equivalent
- From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:22:21 -0400
Dear Kiron,
Panatomic X was my standard studio film when I had my fashion
studio in Manhattan, 74-93. I LOVED it. It was great in 35mm and amazing
in 2 ¼ sq. I developed it in D-76 full strength in 3 ½ gallon tanks because
it was standard to shoot between 20 and 40 rolls per day. It enlarged so
beautifully and gave such rich tones. How we old ones will reminisce, yes?
CHEERS!
BOB
_____
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KironKid@xxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:35 AM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Agfa Paper Equivalent
In a message dated 6/10/2008 8:12:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
In
addition they made Panatomic-X, a very fine grain film, at
about ISO-50. There was a Panatomic film before Panatomic-X
And with the advent of T-Max 100, Kodak discontinued the superb
Panatomic-X 32. Great stuff. I still miss it. I was never satisfied with
the T-Max films. Fortunately, the Ilford Delta's do fine.
Kiron Kid
"A photograph that mirrors reality, cannot compare to one that reflects the
spirit"
_____
Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 2008
<http://citysbest.aol.com?ncid=aolacg00050000000102> .
__________ NOD32 3173 (20080610) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
