On 5/19/2011 3:51 PM, Bill Riley wrote:
I had difficulty with PMK in my Jobo at first. I ended up splitting my development in two and have not had any issues since. For example if the development time was 10 minutes, I developed it twice for 5 minutes each. I end using twice the developer but PMK is very cheap and worth it to me. I’m not a PyroCat user but I know those who have great results with it as well, Eric, If you want to get rid of your PMK, you’re welcome to send it to me... Smile Bill *From:* Eric Nelson <mailto:emanmb@xxxxxxxxx> *Sent:* Thursday, May 19, 2011 2:26 PM *To:* pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *Subject:* [pure-silver] Re: ADV: Re: Efke R100 Chapter 2: PMK This exchange made me wonder what to do with all the PMK I have mixed. :D ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
*From:* Dennis Purdy <dlp4777@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *To:* pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx *Sent:* Thu, May 19, 2011 1:07:53 PM *Subject:* [pure-silver] Re: ADV: Re: Efke R100 Chapter 2: PMK On May 19, 2011, at 08:55, Eric Nelson wrote:Once I switched to Jobo processing, I used PMK for a while till I learned of pyrocat hd and made the switch to that developer. PMK can have some unevenness in rotary whereas pyrocat seems to avoid that with all the benefits of PMK.I was seduced into trying PMK several times over the years and always came to the same conclusion that it was too difficult to get away from the mottling on sheet film. Recently I have been using Pyrocat-HD and it is for me much better than PMK. No mottling at all and nice brownish negs on rolls or sheets that print beautifully. The only problem I have had was recently with FP4, but that turned out to be a problem with Edwals LFN instead. Dennis
I have been processing with PMK using this setup for years: http://www.tundraware.com/Photography/Darkroom/Darkroom-14.jpg I do both reels and sheetfilm in these tanks. I agitate ever 15 sec. I do not get streaking. The only time I've ever contemplated two bath development with PMK is for big (N+2, N+3) pushes because the dev time gets so long the developer can oxidize to exhaustion in the required time. Fortunately, for that kind of push D-76 or HC-110 have always been sufficient, so I haven't much worried about it. The only think I've changed in my approach recently is to move to traditional sheet film development holders/hangers instead using the Gravity Works washing basket shown in the photo. When agitating, film in the basket can come out of the retaining grooves and wreak havoc. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.