[procps] Re: top: NUMA node CPU utilization support
- From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:34:20 -0500
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 18:13 -0500, Jim Warner wrote:
> Our goal is twofold:
>
> 1) Somehow suggest/coax/insist on numa.h and libnuma at build time.
>
> 2) Ensure procps will ship with libnuma (only) so users have access to
> the new '2' and '3' provisions.
Craig,
On second thought, maybe we should drop my build-sys approach and create
a new patch that's not so forgiving.
So basically we keep --disable-numa but in its absence require both
numa.h and libnuma.
Do you want to tweak it or should I send a new patch?
Jim
Other related posts:
