[procps] Re: top: NUMA node CPU utilization support
- From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:27:24 -0500
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 10:29 -0400, Jaromir Capik wrote:
> The libnuma.so symlink is only present when the numactl-devel
> subpackage is installed (in case of Fedora).
>
> $ repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/libnuma.so.1
> numactl-libs-0:2.0.7-7.fc18.x86_64
> $ repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/libnuma.so
> numactl-devel-0:2.0.7-7.fc18.x86_64
>
> Isn't it safer to always specify the major soname
> version?
> If the interface becomes incompatible, then it's probably
> better to avoid loading the library at all. Don't know.
Jaromir,
The 57 days you took to reply will be hard to forget.
Your perspective was needed *before* 3.3.8 was released.
The attached patch addresses the issue.
Jim
Other related posts:
