[procps] Re: top: NUMA node CPU utilization support
- From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:18:56 -0500
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 08:25 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Now we have a third
> - numa enabled but no library - numa variables with no or invalid
> values
>
> So currently any numa related thing is protected by #ifdef NUMA_ENABLED
> which remains, but the values or state needs to be checked too.
Hi Craig,
This new approach will involve no dependencies whatsoever.
After top-3.3.8 is distributed, if ever that old libnuma.so shows up in
an environment (at any point), then the '2' and '3' keys will magically
work.
I'm retraining a #define NUMA_DISABLE in case anyone wants to test the
user interface *as if* libnuma wasn't available.
Jim
Other related posts:
