[procps] Re: top: NUMA node CPU utilization support
- From: "Dr. Werner Fink" <werner@xxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:16:16 +0200
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:52:22PM -0500, Jim Warner wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 08:39 +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:47:26AM -0500, Jim Warner wrote:
> > > I believe Fedora and openSUSE provide libnuma as core packages. And I
> > > think openSUSE even distributes libnuma-devel (numa.h).
> > Good idea Jim, 3 distributions on the list, we can see what all three
> > want and decide then.
>
> Thanks Craig.
>
> I was worried you might be angry.
>
> Now all we gotta' do is hope Jaromir & Werner will talk to us...
... now as Craig has send a ping at least I've read this thread.
For the libnuma support in top it could be an option to make this
not only a build/compile option but also a runtime option. OK this
may required some magic like to declare the functions numa_max_node()
and numa_node_of_cpu() as weak symbols and load the libnuma.so.1 on
demand if available but this may at least solve the problem that
most desktop users are not interested in NUMA support.
Werner
--
"Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr
Other related posts:
