Re: Please advice sql server vs. Oracle
- From: Mladen Gogala <mladen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:24:16 -0500
SQL Server is portable accross all Win2k platforms. As Linux is, according to
Steve Ballmer, akin to communism, it doesn't really matter.
(http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-07-31-002-20-PS-BZ-MS)
Unix is a close relative of Linux and should be considered at least pink,
so the portability accross the Win2k platforms is what really matters.
According to such definition of portability, SQL Server is very portable.
Q.E.D.
On 03/30/2004 10:04:11 AM, Cary Millsap wrote:
> Just curious: On p4, why are the authors adding across platforms? This
> makes the more portable system look like it costs more, whether it
> really does or not.
--
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
