[opendtv] Re: Spectrum Use for Broadcasting
- From: "John Willkie" <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:43:49 -0800
So, you are ALSO abusing the term "broadcasting" since the 5% of revenues
doesn't apply to audio/visual (or advertiser-supported) services sent in the
clear.
And, if you would rather start from scratch, you are destined to fail, but
then, you can't start, can you?
Wow, impressive, "up to 480", when the whole world is looking at "bigger
things." I'd say that's not an attribute, but a limitation.
"Since very little of what a broadcaster delivers needs to be or is
real-time" shows a abject ignorance of the real situation. When there is a
need for real-time (or a requirement for it), they can always go live. If
you are showing movies, nrt is okay, but stations with news generate many
hours a day of LIVE news, and that is required to be live (or viewers need
to be notified that it isn't.)
I'd say that essentially zero content of interest to mobile audiences (which
will always be small), needs to be real-time, so why are you aiming for a
live but not live infrastructure? They could get almost all the content
they need in an overnight download. Licensing local news from the
broadcaster will be impossible to do, and doing it yourself just won't work,
unless you have plenty of money to spend.
Only po' folk will be watching up to 480 lines in their living rooms. Have
fun with that market. Try to force pay services on them, and you get
class-action lawsuits, etc.
People just have very few non-working, non-driving, non-home leisure time to
watch TV, and when they do, they are more likely to use their phones for
their intended purpose: not to watch tv. Or, are you talking about a second
hand-held device?
Bob, this serial cluelessness of yours is starting to grate again.
John Willkie
_____
De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
nombre de Bob Miller
Enviado el: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:26 PM
Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [opendtv] Re: Spectrum Use for Broadcasting
If there are channels available after the transition 2-51 they will probably
be auctioned as well. These channels will be stuck with 8-VSB and its mobile
kludges at best. I would rather start from scratch with a decent modulation
and codec on spectrum above 51 that has few of the rules that broadcasters
have below 52 including NOT having to pay 5% of revenues.
What those channels would fetch at auction might be more related to what TV
"broadcast" channels go for now like the $25 million for a single channel in
Tyler TX. The current auctions are going for a lot less. Tyler TX B Block is
going for $1,270,000.00 and you get TWO channels with more coverage. You
don't get a studio, affiliation or must carry but you can use a decent
codec, don't have to pay 5%, can use a decent modulation, can build an SFN.
If you deliver a broadcast using MPEG4 at resolutions up to and including
480P to devices that have decent storage you can compete with cable or
satellite in the living room while capturing the mobile/portable market.
Since very little of what broadcasters deliver needs to be or is real time
you can fill up those devices storage with more programming than most
viewers will even sift through in a day let alone watch. A good part of
cable and satellite customers will either switch to or add such a service to
their portfolio. The fact that it will be available on their computers, cell
phones and in their living rooms is compelling.
If they also cover large areas, regions or the entire country adds to the
draw.
And they can advertise themselves by offering a number of free channels,
enough to entice many to buy mobile portable devices that receive the free
channels. They can then advertise their pay channels and PPV offerings.
Bob Miller
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Dan <opendtv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--- "Manfredi, Albert E"
<albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But after analog shutoff, if anyone is truly
> interested in BROADCASTING,
> why wouldn't they apply for one of the true
> broadcast frequency bands,
> and guarantee themselves a set of compatible
> receivers already in
> consumer hands? In other words, isn't there going to
> be room in Channels
> 2-51, after analog shutoff, for anyone interested in
> broadcasting?
Are there a lot of unused channels in the top markets,
available for the asking? If not, then buying spectrum
at auction is an alternative to buying an existing
broadcaster.
Dan
____________________________________________________________________________
________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
