[opendtv] Re: Obama Asks Congress to Delay DTV Transition
- From: "John Willkie" <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:44:57 -0800
Asking about energy use is actually asking the wrong question. I think you
meant to ask what percentage of oil goes to transportation use. A good
chunk goes to plastic and other compounds. In one analysis, diesel is a
byproduct of that; in another analysis, gasoline is a byproduct.
To permit hibernation in windows boxes, you have to have the appropriate
motherboard functionality, then "Control Panel" ->Power Options then the
"Hibernate" tag.
However, you will discover that small LCD displays like my 19" one use 1600
watts -- not necessarily much less when 'turned off' due to the wall-wart),
which is about 5x what my computer uses.
My trick is to unplug the cord leading to the wall wart when I walk away
from the screen.
John Willkie
-----Mensaje original-----
De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
nombre de Tom Barry
Enviado el: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:32 PM
Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [opendtv] Re: Obama Asks Congress to Delay DTV Transition
I am not knowledgeable about the peak oil issue but assume that as
supply fails to meet demand prices will rise and we will increasingly
have to use other sources of energy or do without, probably with some
trauma.
Anybody know what percentage of energy use in the USA is for passenger
vehicles? (cars, SUV's, etc.)
- Tom (trying to figure out how to usually hibernate my second computer
due to electric costs)
Barry Wilkins wrote:
> John,
>
> Indeed this is off topic and therefore this shall be the last post from me
> on the issue.
>
> I am sorry to read you are not likely to consider a change of view with
more
> information. I like to keep an open mind and I will always do so. It is
just
> that there has not been any contradictory evidence to counteract the
> overwhelming evidence of imminent peak oil (so far), and I've researched
> this in depth.
>
> I am sorry to have to inform you that the Cantarell decline is NOT
> inherently due to mismanagement but it may appear so from the outside. I
> guess we will have to differ on this.
>
> I applaud your low energy life style and hope I will be able to reduce my
> energy consumption in the future to a similar level.
>
> Here, where I live, the climate is equivalent to the Mediterranean region
> with peak summer temperatures (now) around 38 degrees C or more and winter
> not below 0 degrees. I am on the east coast mid North Island (Napier). I
do
> not use air conditioning nor central heating. I have been using a bus to
> work most days (20km).
>
> New Zealand has a lot of coal but very limited oil. We have gas fields but
> only enough for supply up until 2016 at current consumption. We have
> considerable geothermal regions with associated power stations attached.
> Wind is abundant and wind energy is progressing to make up about 30% of
> generating capacity. Hydro electricity makes up most of the rest.
>
> Thanks for the discussion.
>
> Barry
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:36 PM, John Willkie
<johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Barry;
>>
>>
>>
>> This is off-topic. All the assumptions you and others make assume no
>> change in behavior. This has been an issue for decades, and there are
other
>> places to discuss it. I don't care what people who have not investigated
>> something think about that. While oil is cheap, nothing will change.
Right
>> now, the oil economies are in crisis due to low prices, and it needs to
be
>> noted that high prices caused usage declines for the first time in more
than
>> 30 years.
>>
>>
>>
>> I won't rethink anything; I said as oil becomes more expensive, more
wells
>> will be put into service, but you act as if you read me saying the
>> opposite. Tell me about your personal energy usage. I suspect, you
being
>> in Kiwiland, that you spend much on heating your residence. Does your
>> country of residence a net importer or exporter of oil?
>>
>>
>>
>> Mexico's petroleum problem is a simple one: it's government owned, and
>> that has caused the decline. Social unrest is expected in a few years
when
>> the economic effects of this stupidity - no foreign participation in oil
in
>> Mexico, except for the ability to buy motor oil from various brands -
hits
>> home. Of course, that might be minor in a country where 5300 people were
>> killed in drug gang wars last year.
>>
>>
>>
>> John Willkie
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *De:* opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*En
>> nombre de *Barry Wilkins
>> *Enviado el:* Friday, January 09, 2009 4:43 PM
>>
>> *Para:* opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Asunto:* [opendtv] Re: Obama Asks Congress to Delay DTV Transition
>>
>>
>>
>> John,
>>
>> I know that there are many superficial arguments which apparently
>> contradict the consequences of peak oil. However, there are no sound
>> arguments that state that when the oil becomes scarce the price stays the
>> same. The point is, it gets expensive - very expensive. Those wells you
>> mentioned they can re-open, will quickly diminish in output even if they
get
>> more oil at elevated cost. It is the cost going inexorably up as the
expense
>> of extraction increases that is the problem. Even then, no matter how
hard
>> they pump and with what ever technology, after the global peak, they will
>> not be able to supply the quantity of oil to meet demand, even if the
demand
>> stayed constant (which it shall not).
>>
>> There are no professional people in the oil industry (or out of it) of
any
>> reputable standing, who advocate the hypothesis of rapid subterrainian
>> synthesis of oil over short time scales. If any supposition should be
>> dismissed, it is this one.
>>
>> With regard to your country of residence, which I believe is Mexico, I
have
>> it on good account that although it is a current oil exporter to the US
for
>> instance (around 11% of US imports), the largest field, Cantarell, is on
a
>> very rapid serious decline after peaking and that Mexico is likely to be
a
>> non exporter in less than 2 years.
>>
>> The USA peaked in 1970 as predicted on time by the famous Mr Hubbert and
>> then declined continuously no matter what technology has since been
>> utilized. I understand the USA imports more than 70% of its oil now.
>>
>> Also, take note that the global peak of discovery of oil occured in about
>> 1960. No significant fields of consequence (such as the super giants of
>> Saudi Arabia) have been found since, no matter what fancy new technology
has
>> been used. This is because geologists inherently knew where the best
places
>> to look first. The world has been surveyed in great depth.
>>
>> The UK North Sea oil fields have been in relentless decline for years and
>> ouput only about a fifth that which they did at peak, even with the
latest
>> technology. The UK is in trouble, no doubt about it!
>>
>> The argument of peak oil is not that we will run out. That will not
happen
>> for quite some time. It is that after peak occurs, the price will go
>> inexorably up with the scarcity no matter what you do.
>>
>> You can have a reduction in demand but that will occur due to economic
>> collapse which is directly attributable to the high cost. Hence the
>> consequences are there, stark and real.
>>
>> But of course, I do not expect anybody to take my word for it. Read the
IEA
>> report, December 2008, and then have a rethink.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:52 AM, John Willkie
<johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'd recommend "Serving Two Masters" on Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac.
>>
>>
>>
>> What gets me about most "peak oil" arguments is that they tend to ignore
>> the plain realities that when oil prices get higher (which I am not
>> advocating, but which is something that happens when there is more demand
>> than supply) previously capped oil wells that the drillers found to be
>> uneconomic to run with low prices, suddenly become profitable again.
And,
>> there is more incentive to use shale oil, synthetic fuels, even turning
>> foodstocks (economically) into oil.
>>
>>
>>
>> Then, there is also the question as to how and on what time scale the
Earth
>> makes more oil. That oil comes from crushed plants and dinosaurs is at
this
>> point, only a loose hypothesis, at best. I can't say that the Earth
>> continually generates oil on a rapid time scale, in a fashion that will
>> solve all our problems, but I can't say that isn't the case.
>>
>>
>>
>> I can also say that the end of petroleum for transportation (as a former
>> reporter covering transportation) had been predicted for 1919, 1923, 1926
>> (Spindletop took care of that for a few years), 1929, 1939, 1947, 1954,
and
>> on and on .
>>
>>
>>
>> And, I'm not a big user of oil. I own no car, use public transit, walk,
>> and ride a bicycle. I have no heating or a/c at home, and my electric
bill
>> is about $7 for two months. And, the country I reside in is a net
exporter
>> of oil. Oil fueled all but the earliest stage of the industrial
revolution,
>> and is even more important in the Information Age. It also made what we
>> know as suburbia possible.
>>
>>
>>
>> John Willkie
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *De:* opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*En
>> nombre de *Barry Wilkins
>> *Enviado el:* Friday, January 09, 2009 2:35 PM
>>
>>
>> *Para:* opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Asunto:* [opendtv] Re: Obama Asks Congress to Delay DTV Transition
>>
>>
>>
>> That book, John, is "The Long Emergency" by James Howard Kunstler.
>> Specifically pages 232 and 233 with reference to Fanny Mae etc. Riveting
>> reading in my view. But should you think he is but a lone voice, I
suggest
>> you also refer to another excellent book, "The last oil shock" by David
>> Strahan . Or "Twilight in the Desert" by Matthew R. Simmons or "The End
of
>> Oil" by Paul Roberts.
>> All the above authors come from quite different professional backgrounds
>> and yet all have done intensive studies of this subject.
>>
>> I would be interested to know your and others opinions of their writings
if
>> you have a chance to peruse them.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:39 AM, John Willkie <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Barry;
>>
>>
>>
>> Is that book "Serving Two Masters" by Peter Wallison?
>>
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *De:* opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*En
>> nombre de *Barry Wilkins
>> *Enviado el:* Friday, January 09, 2009 3:58 AM
>>
>>
>> *Para:* opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Asunto:* [opendtv] Re: Obama Asks Congress to Delay DTV Transition
>>
>>
>>
>> John, it must be of considerable concern to you that you believe your new
>> government is likely to dither and behave indecisively. As I understand
it,
>> the US economy (and my own) is somewhat in the "poo" and likely getting
more
>> crappy as the year progresses. I would have thought this is not the time
to
>> be giving away free stuff unless it is food, clothing or shelter.
>>
>> I am currently reading a fascinating book that predicted the demise of
>> Freddy Mac and Fanny Mae. Ironically, a particular paragraph started " By
>> the time you read this book Freddy Mac and Fanny Mae" etc. Yes they have,
>> and this book was published in 2005! It also predicted that if such an
event
>> should happen, as is likely, through a cascading effect, the world
economy
>> is likely to suffer and the US economy very seriously. I am affaid this
book
>> has many other dire warnings related to the phenomenon of "Peak Oil" and
>> before anybody labels me an alarmist I should point out that much of what
>> has been written is substantiated by the latest intensive study by the
IEA
>> (Dec 2008).
>>
>> So, when your and my country's economies do eventually recover we will
>> likely be lumbered with the restrictions of energy starvation.
>>
>> To get back to your original point about decisiveness, yes, I hope that
>> there is an immediate wake up by the powers that be to the looming
dangers
>> ahead and act decisively accordingly.
>>
>> Regards
>> Barry Wilkins
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:12 PM, John Willkie <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Good points all, Barry. Basically, it's a forewarning of how the coming
>> administration will deal with the smallest forms of adversity; they will
>> surrender or delay making even moderately firm decisions.
>>
>>
>>
>> I was thinking after our earlier exchange on this list that the entities
>> "most hurt" by this will be the television stations whose viewers "skew"
>> either old or poor. Nobody is guaranteed television, or even free
>> television. We are very much unlike, say, the UK on that point. Come to
>> think of it, Freeview did give away receivers .
>>
>>
>>
>> John Willkie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *De:* opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*En
>> nombre de *Barry Wilkins
>> *Enviado el:* Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:01 PM
>>
>>
>> *Para:* opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Asunto:* [opendtv] Re: Obama Asks Congress to Delay DTV Transition
>>
>>
>>
>> Why, exactly, should at the very last minute, a delay be made to account
>> for all those who must surely have been adequately forewarned of this
>> momentous change?
>>
>> Those coupons your government generously distributes to the needy are
>> something rather unique to the USA. I do not believe any other countries
had
>> such a handout to the populace. I paid my NZ $399 for my STB and I
consider
>> it well worth it. Your STBs are so cheap in comparison even without the
>> subsidy, I fail to see what the fuss is about. As I mentioned on one
other
>> occasion, the cost surely must be no more than a good night out at a
>> restaurant for 2.
>>
>> So, if adequate warning has been given and the STBs are dirt cheap
anyway,
>> why not get on with it. A certain proportion will accept it is their own
>> fault for leaving it too long and go get cable or sky. The others will no
>> doubt zoom off to the nearest store to get an STB at any cost.
>>
>> Reception with dubious antennas may be another story...
>>
>> Good luck with your transition!
>>
>> Barry Wilkins
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:37 PM, John Willkie <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Tom;
>>
>> It is VERY DANGEROUS to personalize attorneys working for private clients
>> as
>> if they were something more than wage slaves advocating for a well-paying
>> client.
>>
>> Eric Holder as AG is a different matter, at least as pertains to the
pardon
>> of Marc Rich. Holder was working on a discretionary matter and was
>> supposed
>> to be representing the United States, not the Democratic Party. Never
>> befor
>> has someone who was a fugitive from justice been pardoned. I suspect his
>> nomination hearings will largely be a rubber-stamping session in the
>> current
>> climate.
>>
>> Also, it's a non-sequitur to be in favor of an empty vessel (Obama)
because
>> you were disgusted with the Bush Administration. George Bush hasn't been
>> on
>> a ballor since 1984.
>>
>> When you're an empty vessel that people pour their dreams into, it
doesn't
>> take much to disaffect people. Making no decisions is easier than making
>> decisions.
>>
>> John Willkie
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>
>> De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
>>
>> nombre de Tom Barry
>> Enviado el: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:13 PM
>> Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Asunto: [opendtv] Re: Obama Asks Congress to Delay DTV Transition
>>
>>
>> I strongly supported Obama due to my disgust with many actions of the
>> Bush administration.
>>
>> But Obama certainly is not getting off to a very good start on some
>> issues that I care about. Delaying the transition is a very bad idea
>> right now.
>>
>> And two of the people he is appointing to the justice department are a
>> couple of my least favorite IP monopoly lawyers that prosecuted the
>> carpet bombing of mp3 download lawsuits and defended the Mickey Mouse
>> interminable copyright extension before the Supreme Court. It looks
>> like Obama is going to go with Biden's position on these types of issues.
>>
>> So I guess the honeymoon is already over for me. <sigh>
>>
>> - Tom
>>
>>
>> John Willkie wrote:
>>> Elections have consequences, but I thought that we only had one
president
>> at
>>> a time. Delaying the inevitable will do about nothing to get people to
>> buy
>>> converter boxes. I always thought the idea of doing the transition in
>> the
>>> middle of a Nielsen sweep would be interesting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John Willkie, who notes that anything that Ed Markey supports is by
>>> experience, very foolish.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _____
>>>
>>> De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> En
>>> nombre de James Albro
>>> Enviado el: Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:13 PM
>>> Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Asunto: [opendtv] Obama Asks Congress to Delay DTV Transition
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here we go...
>>>
>>> Obama Asks Congress to Delay DTV Transition
>>>
>>>
>>> By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 1/8/2009 2:30:00 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> Related:
>>> The <http://www.broadcastingcable.com/Community/DTV+Countdown/48696.html
>>>
>>> DTV Countdown: Complete Coverage of the DTV Transition
>>> Markey: Feb. <http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6627445.html>
>> 17
>>> DTV Date May Have To Move
>>>
>>> President-elect Barack Obama has asked Congress to extend the Feb. 17
DTV
>>> transition date.
>>>
>>> Citing problems with the DTV-to-analog converter box program and
>> "inadequate
>>> funding" of government DTV education programs, John Podesta, co-chair of
>> the
>>> Obama-Biden transition team, requested that "the cut-off date for analog
>>> signals should be reconsidered and extended."
>>>
>>> That is according to a letter (click
>>> <
>> http://www.broadcastingcable.com/contents/pdf/Podesta%20DTV%20Letter.pdf>
>>> here to view) being sent Thursday to the chairs and ranking Republicans
>> on
>>> the House and Senate Committees overseeing communications (The House
>> Energy
>>> & Commerce Committee and Senate Commerce Committee).
>>>
>>> Saying that only 28 days after the inauguration Americans would wake up
>> to
>>> find their analog TV's no longer able to receive an over-the-air
>> signal-and
>>> pointing to the decision on the date made in 2005 and implemented by the
>>> outgoing administration-Podesta urged them to "consider a change to the
>>> legislatively mandated cut-off date."
>>>
>>> He said that funds to support the conversion are "woefully inadequate,"
>>> particularly to address the problems of seniors and low income viewers.
>>>
>>> He also suggested that there would be money from the president-elect's
>>> economic recovery package that would help address the funding
shortfalls.
>>>
>>> Consumers
>>>
>> <
>>
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/contents/pdf/CU_DTV%20Letter%20to%20House%<
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/contents/pdf/CU_DTV%20Letter%20to%20House%2
5>
>>> 20Commerce_FINAL.PDF> Union, which called for a similar move Wednesday
>>> after consultation with the transition, has suggested moving the date to
>>> midsummer.
>>>
>>> C 2009, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All
>>> Rights Reserved.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>>
>> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>> FreeLists.org
>>
>> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>>
>> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
>> FreeLists.org
>>
>> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
>> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
