Started one on McGreevey (no responses, hard to call it a thread) or used it as another example of the difference between live and non-live TV. John Willkie -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Cliff Benham Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 6:48 AM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: FCC on VoIP I guess so...You started one on New Jersey's Gov last week... -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Willkie Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 7:35 PM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: FCC on VoIP This has to do with broadcasting or digital television or cable or satellites just exactly how? Can I start a thread here on terrorism and U.S. immigration policy? John Willkie -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Manfredi, Albert E Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 3:16 PM To: OpenDTV (E-mail) Subject: [opendtv] FCC on VoIP Wow. I'm not sure how to read this. On the one hand, VoIP should be controlled with more precision by the FCC, just as the telephone lifeline service is. If someone uses VoIP as their phone service, it makes no objective sense for the FCC to regulate it less than it regulates the traditional telco telephone service (in terms of four or five nines reliability, uninterrupted service during power outages, and so on). But that would be an extra burden to data ISPs, primarily those using the cable TV broadband nets, who want to start offering telephone service. It would mean providing power over their cables, or perhaps providing individual UPS units to each subscriber and to each of their system nodes? What Powell says seems to be that regulations which now govern telephone service will not apply to VoIP regulations. Rather, VoIP should be treated like any IP service. So if some people think Powell favored the big telcos by not forcing them to share their local loop, here he's favoring the cable TV systems, or so it would appear. Seems to me that if VoIP telephony is regulated like web browsing, perhaps the traditional telephone service should also be freed from its stringent requirements. A few years ago, at one of the IETF meetings, Vint Cerf himself got up and said that the Internet will have arrived when people can trust it as they do their telephone. I'm not sure, but maybe this will come true the other way around. That is, by degrading the telephone service to equal their ISP connection? Bert ----------------------------------- Powell says telecom regulation needs change Paul Kapustka, Advanced IP Pipeline Aug 24, 2004 (4:00 PM) URL: http://www.commsdesign.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=3D3D30000388 ASPEN, Colo. - Saying voice-over-IP (VoiP) is the "killer app for legal policy change," Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael Powell said Monday (Aug. 23) that the country's telecom regulatory scheme needs a complete overhaul, the sooner the better. Speaking at the Progress and Freedom Foundation's Aspen Summit, Powell said the 1996 Telecom Act was a broken piece of law, and one that hampers innovation and clarity in the fast-changing telecom and Advanced IP services markets. "It's dated legislation that doesn't fit the market," said Powell of the Telecom Act. Though Powell cautioned that a complete rewrite of the Act should be done with consummate care -- "one of the most important things is to get it right" -- he also said that Congress might consider giving IP-based communications its own legal category, to help end the endless litigation that now occurs whenever the FCC tries to issue a decision. "Just give IP its own category -- that's all I'm asking for at the moment," Powell said. Though no legislation is likely to pass in the near future, Powell did note that the disruptive force of new technologies like VoIP is impossible to ignore. VoIP presents a "classic manifestation of the moment of truth," Powell said, and will force legislators to bring more clarity to what is a telecom service, what is a data service, and how (if at all) IP communications should be regulated. "This thing has resonance and speed," Powell said of VoIP. "There's no way to dance around it. I love the anxiety, and I love the screaming." What Powell hopes is that Congress will follow his lead and classify IP-based communications as something separate from the traditional phone system. Only then, he said, will investment and innovation flow. "The seminal question is, do we convert the Internet into a big black telephone, only because we're lazy?" Powell asked. "If you don't win that battle, [you will] draw down progress by decades." Copyright 2003 CMP Media ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. =20 =20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at = FreeLists.org=20 - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word = unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.