I could care less about E911. My comments refer to wiretap regulations. The PBX is open source. Who goes out of business? And as for certifying services for E911 - BFD, they just have to undergo the same reliability tests as the standard analog 911. There was a time when those lines were also unreliable. I'd say practically, you have no argument. :-) Cheers Kon John Willkie wrote: > Regulation, technology and economics? > > Technically, you have a good argument. Practically, you have none. The > first time there's a life and death situation and a PBX user is not able to > use the system to call the appropriate enhanced 911 service provider in less > than a second, and death results, everybody associated with the sale and > installation goes out of business, because insurance cannot cover deliberate > acts. > > The PBX maker goes out of business, along with the installer, the reseller, > the customer, the repair folks, the service provider, etc. > > Just ONE DEATH. > > So, you wanna play tactics in this area, or strategy? > > John Willkie > > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kon Wilms > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:25 AM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Re: FCC on VoIP > > > John Willkie wrote: > >>The pending issues are Enhanced 911, CALEA access (hard to wiretap a VoIp >>connection, even with a court order) and the like. > > > Good luck. Just add strong crypto on the software PBX sides where > packets are IP encapsulated after coding and you're done. > > I thought the voip wiretap was already given the go-ahead a week or two > ago.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.