[openbeosstorage] Re: session module
- From: Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:24:57 -0800
> > Yes, I see no reason not to do otherwise (I do like BeOS' cdda
> > filesystem :-).
> >
> > > Then it seems the flags for session 1 are not set correctly. They
> > > should indicate a data session.
> >
> > Oops, I'll fix that, thanks.
>
> Already done. I had to, when fixing the error above. :-)
Thanks :-)
>
> > > Even more things to discover: Our implementation implicitly
> > > assumes,
> > > that the (logical) block size of the device is also that of the
> > > session
> > > and the partitions. Shall the session and the partition modules
> > > return
> > > their block size? I mean, there is a field in both of the
> > > structures,
> > > so that wouldn't be a problem.
> >
> > Hmmm, they could... Are they likely to ever differ, thoguh?
>
> In the example above they do. Session 0 has a block size of 512, while
> 1 has 2048.
Oops, missed that, too :-) Seems like a reasonable argument for letting
FSes dictate block sizes when appropriate.
-Tyler
Other related posts:
