Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2003-02-19 at 07:10:52 [-0800], Ingo Weinhold wrote: > > I think such a cookie would be fine in the kernel, but I would > > definitely not pass it to the userland. If only the kernel caused > > accesses to the disk=5Fscanner modules, when updating its live list, > > then > > that will work. In this case the userland would get a copy of the > > kernel's list instead of causing module access itself. > > > > Well, I'd say that's another good reason to move things into the > kernel, as it could greatly speed up CD recognition. Yes, I'm more and more inclined to that to. CU, Ingo