Ol' Whitworth didn't do a bad job, except for 3/16W which (in my 'umble opinion) has too small a core diameter ----- Original Message ----- From: "alanjstepney" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 9:27 PM Subject: [modeleng] Re: unknown thread > Whitorth worked out his standard, based upon lots of samples of existing > threads, plus some calculations (guesses) of the ideal thread. > > Sellers did the same in the USA. (A few years later, it must be said.) > > Meanwhile, on that bit of land off the coast of England, they worked out > their own threads. > At one time, the Germans, French and Swiss all had their own standards, but > these gradually came down to a few, then eventually to one, Metric. They > then foisted it on the rest of humanity. > alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > www.alanstepney.info > Model Engineering, Steam Engine, and Railway technical pages. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <peter.chadwick@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 12:03 PM > Subject: [modeleng] Re: unknown thread > > > Can anyone explain how/why the different thread angles appeared? I thought > it was accepted that the first 'standardised' thread was BSW, which is a > 55 degree thread, and this was followed by BSF, also a 55 degree. When and > why did the 60 degree of US standard and metric appear? For that matter, > why 47.5 degrees for BA/Thrury ? > Peter Chadwick > > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, > modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject > line. > > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, > modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line. > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.