Thursday, May 26, 2005, 4:42:12 AM, Brian wrote: >> So, Brian, what do you conclude from that? We should increase our >> military spending >> (without, of course, paying for it with taxes)? B> Why in the world wouldn't we pay for it with taxes? Because a minimal state might be thought of as non-minimal when military spending extends beyond a certain point? B> I haven't seen the newest outlays in both dollars and equipment so B> I'm not sure which way I'd go. But I do know one thing: except for B> ending slavery, fascism, Communism and Nazism, war never solved B> anything. It's news to me that war ended Communism (I think you must mean "brought about the end of the USSR and the ancien regime in Eastern Europe"), perhaps you could say more about this. And many say your Civil War wasn't about slavery in the US, still, it did bring about its end there. But the discussion here's about US military spending. Bush's administration is "the biggest spending administration in decades" (Cato Institute, http://www.cato.org/ and see FactCheck http://www.factcheck.org/article139.html ) US military spending as a percentage of discretionary spending was 49 per cent in 2003. (US Government data) The Cato Institute, of course, wanted other non-discretionary spending cut (education and health, say) and that is what's happening. -- mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html