A. Amago: > The point is that today's wave of immigration differs from past waves in their unwillingness to assimilate. Is this accurate? From my admittedly very narrow perspective, I should think that the Latino immigrants today assimilate at the same rate as all the past generations of immigrants. Not the immigrants, but their children and their children's children do the assimilating, but at the same time they change the larger culture -- life's not a one way street, you know. Every experience of difference changes you -- or should. > They come not to America but to a new and better Mexico. You're being a bit ethno-centric there, don't you think? How about we settle on "a new and wealthier Mexico?" It'd be a damn hard job to pass off the violence and crass materialism and Jerry Springerism and Reality TVism and Christian fundamentalism that's so much 'America' (as Speranza would have it) in this country as "better", I do think. Mike Geary still erin go braghing in Memphis (2nd generation American on my mother's side) > Given the emotionality in this response, it's clear you know nothing at all about the book. No one is deploring multiculturalism. We are a country of pizza parlors and Chinese restaurants and St. Patrick's Day parades and Columbus Day parades and all the rest of it. The point is that today's wave of immigration differs from past waves in their unwillingness to assimilate. Where the Italians and the Irish and the whoever came over with the thought of becoming Americans, staying here, learning the language, making this their country, today's largely Hispanic immigrants come to our shores not as would be Americans but as Mexicans, etc. who never really left Mexico, etc. They come not to America but to a new and better Mexico. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html