I sent the post below off-list in error; a simple 'Reply' to a lit-ideas post normally goes to the List, but that time, not. *********** I have, Walter, searched the archives. I can find no relevant reference to 'Manny' or 'Chuck', though there was indeed a thread on 'Chuck Taylor'. I have not found any passages referring to men analogous to >And one from me via Onora on why being a Scrooge is not universalizable: and >the material on Imagination and >reflective judgement that Hannah attempts to re-work into a theory of >>political >judgement. I give here my posts that began this > I should have asked this before, I suppose. Why "Hannah" but > "Kant"? > and >You know Onora? >-- for those who don't: (Baroness) Onora O'Neill, Professor of Philosophy >at Cambridge, writes a lot about Manny. really I see no need to apologise. Judith Evans, Cardiff --- On Mon, 6/4/09, Walter C. Okshevsky <wokshevs@xxxxxx> wrote: > From: Walter C. Okshevsky <wokshevs@xxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [lit-ideas] Re: Filling in the Blanks: Lit-Ideas: A Survey > To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Judith Evans" <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Monday, 6 April, 2009, 9:47 PM > Quoting Judith Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > WO: > > > And, lest we forget, I'm also a sexist male > in virtue of > > > referring to Taylor as > > > "Chuck," to Kant as "Manny," > to > > > O'Neill as "Onora" and to Arendt as > > > "Hannah." > > > > On this List? That's not my impression. > > As far as I know, this is the only list that boasts both of > our memberships. I > have afforded you 3 months in which to issue the apology I > believe I so rightly > deserve. Your allegation was outrageous and deeply hurtful > to me. And yet no > apology has been forthcoming from you. Returning to his > offlist fortress of > solitude, > > Walter O. > > P.S. Apologies for the previous double postings. I see now > what causes that. > > --- On Mon, 6/4/09, Walter C. Okshevsky <wokshevs@xxxxxx> wrote: > From: Walter C. Okshevsky <wokshevs@xxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [lit-ideas] Re: Filling in the Blanks: Lit-Ideas: A Survey > To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Judith Evans" <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Monday, 6 April, 2009, 9:47 PM > Quoting Judith Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > WO: > > > And, lest we forget, I'm also a sexist male > in virtue of > > > referring to Taylor as > > > "Chuck," to Kant as "Manny," > to > > > O'Neill as "Onora" and to Arendt as > > > "Hannah." > > > > On this List? That's not my impression. > > As far as I know, this is the only list that boasts both of > our memberships. I > have afforded you 3 months in which to issue the apology I > believe I so rightly > deserve. Your allegation was outrageous and deeply hurtful > to me. And yet no > apology has been forthcoming from you. Returning to his > offlist fortress of > solitude, > > Walter O. > > P.S. Apologies for the previous double postings. I see now > what causes that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/4/09, Walter C. Okshevsky > <wokshevs@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > From: Walter C. Okshevsky <wokshevs@xxxxxx> > > > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Filling in the Blanks: > Lit-Ideas: A Survey > > > To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Phil > Enns" <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Date: Sunday, 5 April, 2009, 7:26 PM > > > And, lest we forget, I'm also a sexist male > in virtue of > > > referring to Taylor as > > > "Chuck," to Kant as "Manny," > to > > > O'Neill as "Onora" and to Arendt as > > > "Hannah." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, > vacation on/off, > > digest on/off), visit > www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html