[lit-ideas] Re: Do You Have a Moral Urgency?

  • From: "Simon Ward" <sedward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:01:14 +0100

Phil, you're very close to presenting an argument for genocide. Is that what you intend to put forward?

Simon

----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Enns" <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:45 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Do You Have a Moral Urgency?



Judy Evans corrects me:

"I imagine we can count MOST Of the women and children as civilians."

Mea Culpa.  I missed the qualifier.  I apologize.

However, the criterion is still inadequate.  If one cannot distinguish
between combatant and non-combatant, and any person could be a
combatant, then one cannot assume that most of the women and children
are civilians.  I wish we could, but Hezbollah has made that impossible.
This is much like Iraq where people must always be on guard because
anyone, even a woman or child, could be a suicide bomber.

Ideally one would like to be able to distinguish combatants, and one
could assume that most women and children are not combatants.  Sadly,
some people blur the lines to further their own ends.


Sincerely,

Phil Enns
Toronto, ON

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html



------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: