In other words, philosophy doesn't concern itself with empirical things, otherwise known as reality. From a moral perspective, we don't need to worry about reality. Sounds good. Maybe that's why we're doing as well as we're doing in Iraq, because we don't worry about little things like reality and consequences. But then we don't worry about morality either except to point our big fingers at the other guy who's 100% wrong while we're 100% right. > [Original Message] > From: Walter Okshevsky <wokshevs@xxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 8/17/2006 7:45:44 AM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Do You Have a Moral Urgency? > > That's an empirical question. From a moral perspective, we don't have to. > > W.C.O > Memorial U. > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Andy Amago wrote: > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: <wokshevs@xxxxxx> > > > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: 8/16/2006 1:24:51 PM > > > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Do You Have a Moral Urgency? > > > > > >We typically have no > > > control over consequences. > > > > > > > > > > We don't reap what we sow? > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html