[lit-ideas] Re: Another perspective on VP selections

  • From: "John McCreery" <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:36:09 +0900

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Judith Evans
<judith.evans001@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>
>> Another thing about Obama's inexperience. I don't think he knows he's got
> it.  He comes across as knowing how to do everything.  He advises others. He
> doesn't get advice.  If he's elected don't expect him to spend much time
> listening to Joe Biden -- in my opinion.
>


Lawrence,
This is simply an outright lie.  Which candidate was it, after all, who
actually met with a top team of economic and business leaders to consider
the nation's economic problems, including two former top advisors to the
Bush administration and, by the way knows enough economics (most
Harvard-trained lawyers do) to understand what they were saying?  His name
did not begin with M.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/28/obama-huddling-with-econo_n_115337.html


Which candidate doesn't brag "I know how to win wars," but meets with top
generals who actually have won wars. The name isn't McCain. It's Obama.

http://securingamerica.com/node/2963


On the other hand if you want a President whose handlers worry that he goes
off half-cocked after each new phone call from someone with a different
opinion,  then McCain should be your man.

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/John_McCain_s_Cell_Phone_Privileges_Have_Been_Curtailed

Lawrence, the evidence is clear. You are either a brazen liar or a dupe. In
neither case worth listening to.

John


John McCreery
The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN
Tel. +81-45-314-9324
http://www.wordworks.jp/

Other related posts: