So from what you are saying are the files wordDocument.sem and w_wordDocument.sem no longer needed? If so why have they not been deleted from the project?
I must stress though, this is not docx, it is Word XML, like if you select the format Word XML 2003 in the save dialog of word (it is a single XML not an archive containing multiple files). Will docx.sem work on this?
Will I need to create a config file to ensure docx.sem is used? Michael Whapples On 18/10/2013 17:25, John J. Boyer wrote:
Separate semantic-action files are not needed for documents that use namespaces. Semantic-action files use only the local names. Given the possibility of name conflicts, maybe this should be changed. Both of the old MSWord semantic-action files are wrong. Look at docx.sem in the lbu_files directory of liblouisutdmll. You can correct or delete the old files. John On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 04:37:35PM +0100, Michael Whapples wrote:If that is so then the Word XML semantic action files (I believe both wordDocument.sem and w_wordDocument.sem are wrong as they assign document action to wordDocument and w:wordDocument elements. PS. Why do we need separate semantic action files for when a namespace is used or not? Also relying on the XML to alias the namespace as w: seems to be wrong as potentially one can alias it as they like: eg. xmlns:w="..." or xmlns:word="...", both would be correct XML and mean the same. Michael Whapples On 18/10/2013 02:16, John J. Boyer wrote:In dtbook.sem ad nimas.sem the action document is given to <book> because it contains the actual docummennt. <dtbook> contains the head node as well. So for the xml part of docx <body> must be given the action document. The root element <document> gets no action. That is the way things are set up. John On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:09:52PM +0100, Michael Whapples wrote:No the document node should be w:wordDocument. Looks like w:body is given the action no. In Word XML w:body is like body in HTML, where the body of the document will be found, so why should brl nodes appear outside that? Also I notice two .sem files for Word documents, looks like one is for when there is a XML namespace in the Word XML and the other is for where there is not. There seems to be differences between these (eg. w:wordDocument has action no where as wordDocument has action document). Michael Whapples On 17/10/2013 18:09, John J. Boyer wrote:What semantic action is asigned to the w:body node? It should be document. Lok at the docx.sem file in lbu_files . John On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 05:46:50PM +0100, Michael Whapples wrote:Where can the brl nodes appear in a UTDML document? We have a Word XML file which has been marked with UTDML and the last brl node for the last page number appears outside the document body (w:body) element. This looks strange and means that one has to get the parser to look outside the body of the document to get all Braille, which is certainly sub-optimal as one will need to filter out much unwanted stuff. Is LibLouisUTDML working correctly in placing this brl node outside the body element? Michael Whapples For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.comFor a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.comFor a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
