[LRFlex] Re: Will it ever arrive?
- From: Stasys Petravicius <stasys1@xxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:19:19 -0800
on 2/21/05 12:11 PM, Steve Barbour at kididdoc@xxxxxxx wrote:
> David Young wrote:
>> At 2/21/2005, you wrote:
>>
>>> David Young wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm quite willing to concede that the DM-R, when (if) produced will
>>>> yield better photos than a LeiCanon.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> clip.........
>>>
>>>
>>> David, may I ask you why you say that... above... ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Steve!
>>
>> I say this for several reasons... though only one of them is compelling.
>>
>> 1) more pixels - though this is not hugely significant unless you're
>> making HUGE prints. In 12x18 size, I don't think there would be a huge
>> difference.
>>
>> 2) larger sensor... lower magnification factor and a slightly larger
>> pixel size. Larger pixels inherently yield less noise.
>>
>> 3) The Leica will be the ONLY dSLR which does not have an anti-aliasing
>> filter in front of the sensor. Anti-aliasing filters reduce resolution
>> in any optical system, but are needed to prevent/reduce moire patterns
>> in repeating patterns of photographed objects.
>>
>> This last one is critical, I believe, to Leica's actually delivering a
>> better picture, and thus staying in the game. Imacon (who are developing
>> and building the DM-R for Leica) are building in a cure for moire
>> patterns in software, which can be turned on - after the fact, as I
>> understand it, if they appear in any of the shots. (I could be wrong on
>> the "after the fact" bit.)
>>
>> If it works, it will allow the back to deliver sharper pictures than any
>> other dSLR.
>>
>> I also understand that problems with this software is the main reason
>> for the delay in delivery of the DM-R.
>>
>> It is also why I am concerned about it needing future updates.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David.
>
> Very compelling David...
>
> I'm sold...where can I get one ?
> Ohhhh.....errrrrhhhh ....hmmmmm....
>
>
> 1. it's all theory right now
> 2. very high cost
> 3. so far it's close to vaporwear...
> 4. it might be disappear-wear
> 5. it needs to be widely tested in real life...
> 6. a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush
>
> It started out sounding exciting, then exorbitant,
> then improbable, now a risk, and ultimately could
> be downright foolish... given the way Leicas
> fortunes are going...
>
> Steve
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
> www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Steve- I have one on order- and all these posts are making me a little
nervous! I'm trying to avoid a Canon/Leica/adapter hybrid compromise!!
Stasys
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
