Thank you Charlie greetings, axel----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlie Chan" <topoxforddoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 12:29 AM Subject: [LRflex] Re: R lenses That's the one. I've got one as well (80-200/4 ROM Kyocera made). Has to be the bargain of the R lens range. GBP500-600 now on the used market and IQ wise hardly much difference between it and its bigger cousin, the 70-180/2.8 APO. Charlie Chan Cheltenham, UK topoxforddoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.cancer-surgeon.co.uk www.charlie-chan.co.uk On 30 Nov 2009, at 22:56, Axel Collier wrote:
hi Doug is the 80-200mm f4 you talk about a Vario-Elmar? thank you Axel Vario- Elmar ----- Original Message ----- From: <wildlightphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 7:46 PM Subject: [LRflex] Re: R lenses David Simms wrote:... the sterling 70mm to 180mm zoom which is reputedly as sharp, orsharper,as any of the best single focal length lenses.zooms! I forgot all about zooms. In the longer end of the focal length range Leica has sold several models. The 70-180 f/2.8 APO certainlydeserves its sterling reputation. Nearly as good and much smaller, lighterand affordable is the 80-200mm f/4.The 80-200 f/4 is a Leica design made for Leica by Kyocera in Japan. Don't be bothered by the manufacturing location, this is as Leica a lens as theycome. Sharp at full aperture with excellent color rendition, flare resistance and bokeh, some light fall-off toward the corners at f/4, very solid Leica construction quality.Other lenses in this range are Minolta designs, made by Minolta for Leica,in chronological order: 80-200mm f/4.5 - quite an old design, from 1976 IIRC 75-200mm f/4.5 70-210mm f/4 The f/4.5 lenses use 55mm filters, the f/4 zooms use 60mm filters. The Minolta-sourced lenses were good in their day, but the 80-200 f/4 and the 70-180 APO are quite a bit better.My experience with the Minolta-sourced zooms is limited to the 75-200 f/4.5 which has excellent flare resistance, but shows some wierd bokeh artifactsand isn't Leica construction quality. It also has a hood that cannot beretracted at the shortest focal lenght, making turning a polarizing filter frustrating. The front element also rotates while focussing so this is nota lens I'd recommend for using a polarizing filter. Contrasted with this the 80-200mm f/4 has non-rotating focus and the hood can be retracted at all focal lengths.At the short end Leica also made a 21-35mm which I have no experience with.Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web LIVE - Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology - http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/