[LRflex] Re: Mid range zoom advice
- From: "Tim Bedsted" <Tim.Bedsted@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:49:12 +0100
Aram,
Peter M. C.Werner has some test shots of the 35-70/4, 28-70/3.5 and also the
Angenieux 35-70/2.3 zooms on the FredMiranda thread.
However, I to have had problems finding a "objective" comparison between these
lenses, so hopefully something will emerge.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Aram Langhans
Sent: Tue 7/02/2006 8:44 PM
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: [LRflex] Mid range zoom advice
I am thinking the unforgivable - actually buying a zoom lens. I
thought a
mid range one would be the place to start since the majority of my
shots are
with a 35, 50, or the 100 APO.
So, I have heard good things about the 35-70 f-4 zoom. I know there is
also
a 28-70 f-3.5-4.5 zoom, but I can only remember vague not-so-good
references
to it. I checked out Doug's site and he has no experience or
description of
the latter. The extra wide range might be a good thing if I ever
decided to
get a digital body with a crop factor.
So, can anyone give me feedback on these two lenses?
Don't worry. I will not be giving up my primes, especially the 100. I
just
thougth it might lighten my load a bit and speed some travel/tourist
type
shots with the zoom.
Aram
_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how
to
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: application/ms-tnef
-- File: winmail.dat
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
