[LRflex] Re: C***n or N***n?
- From: a aa <classwp@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:45:00 -0500
hii Mehrdad,
Yes, we have a knack for selecting orphans: Contax RTS, Leica R (I
won't mention either Alpa or Contarex here).
I can't see having both Nikon and Canon. Just one will have to do.
2009/11/16 mehrdad <msadat@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Akhil, you & i keep buying systems gets discontinued all the time. we
> should be use it!
>
> canon offers a better lens selection, nikon has a little better cameras.
>
> being in your situation i opted for both canon and nikon, cuz it was
> difficult to choose
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:06 AM, a aa <classwp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Bearing in mind the demise of the R system, and the recent
>> announcement of CZ primes (with licenced EOS, and now Nikon ROMs) for
>> the EOS and Nikon mounts leads me to ask this list a hypothetical
>> question: If you had to jump would you opt for Canon or Nikon?
>>
>> FWIW, I am very close to selling off my R bodies and lenses,and no,
>> the third -party flange/adapter solutions for R lenses do not work for
>> me. I do not want to go back to the 1950's when Alpas, Exaktas and
>> Praktinas with stop down lenses were state-of-the-art SLRs.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Akhil
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> Archives are at:
>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------
> regards, mehrdad
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
