[LRflex] Re: C***n or N***n?
- From: "Aram Langhans" <leica_r8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:17:57 -0800
Can't believe that web site is still up. doesn't anyone ever empty the
Internet Trash?
I don't believe that device was ever actually made for market. Too bad, as I
was waiting.
Aram
From: Charlie Falke
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:13 AM
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LRflex] Re: C***n or N***n?
Doug Herr wrote:
Gary E wrote:
One Leica forum member mentioned a digital SL, which if is one of the choices
and is chosen, I would be like a pig in a mud pool.
<<<
Likewise. If Leica made something like this available my DMRs - both of them -
would be for sale faster than you can say "Leicaflex".
Doug Herr
Doug, Gary,
It was available 11 years ago. It wasn't very good
even at that time. It would need to use the M9 sensor,
for example, and it would be easiest to implement if
one would give up chimping.
On the other hand there is no problem opening the
back to get at it. It won't fog any film. :-)
But then you would have a digital SL, M4, IIIF,
the old Nikon F that lives on your Questar...
whatever you dropped it into.
http://www.epi-centre.com/reports/imagek.html
--
Charlie Falke _____ /\
| __/\__/------/__)
|(____\/_________/
"One test result is worth | |/ `o
one thousand expert opinions" - Wernher Von Braun 0 N4003M
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Albert Einstein------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
