[PCB_FORUM] Re: default-x.dlt file snafu
- From: george.h.patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:18:04 -0800
I am on 16.0, and it works., Gary. Are you on 15?
--
George Patrick
Tektronix, Inc.
Central Engineering, EDS Application Support
P.O. Box 500, M/S 39-512
Beaverton, OR 97077-0001
* 503-627-5272 (voice) * 503-627-5587 (fax)
http://www.tektronix.com <http://www.tektronix.com/>
http://www.pcb-designer.com <http://www.pcb-designer.com/>
"Off grid and Proud of it!"
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Dave Elder
Sent: Thu 1/10/2008 4:52 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: default-x.dlt file snafu
Hi Gary,
The following line in a dlt file returns the expected result for me:
((150.0 70.0) "Plated" "+/- 0.2")
Running SPB_16.01. Maybe it's a release problem
Cheers, Dave
Macindoe, Gary wrote, On 11/01/2008 12:35 p.m.:
George,
Here is the line as modified per your suggestion, cut and pasted from
my default-mil.dlt file:
((85.0 40.0) "Plated" "85.0 x 40.0 +/- 4.0")
With the line as above, when I go Manufacture -> NC -> Drill Legend...
I get this error at the command line:
E- *Error* __ncMKSConvert: argument #1 should be a number (type
template = "n") - (85.0 40.0)
Thanks,
Gary
<https://webmail.tek.com/exchange/george.h.patrick/Drafts/RE:%20%5BPCB_FORUM%5D%20Re:%20default-x.dlt%20file%20snafu.EML/1_multipart/ATT125064079.gif>
Gary E. MacIndoe
PCB Design Engineer
Fort Collins, Colorado
amd.com
gary.macindoe@xxxxxxx
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
george.h.patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 4:15 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: default-x.dlt file snafu
Your line needs to read "((85.0 40.0) "Plated" "85.0 x 40.0 +/- 4.0")",
not "(85.0 x 40.0) "Plated" "85.0 x 40.0 +/- 4.0")". The two parenthesis at
the start are very important, and the "x" is getting confused for the second
coordinate, which is probably the cause for the error :) This is straight out
of the comments, and how I have it set up to work here.
Skill code (which includes these files, clipboard files, and such) does
not pay attention to carriage returns. You can literally crunch them down into
one line and they will still work (as long as you remove the comments). It is
OK that the two parentheses are on different lines, it doesn't matter. You
could probably even format the above line like
(
(
85.0
40.0
)
"Plated"
"85.0 x 40.0 +/- 4.0"
)
and it would probably still work (never tried this but it is consistent
with other skill structures).
--
George Patrick
Tektronix, Inc.
Central Engineering, EDS Applications Support
P.O. Box 500, M/S 39-512
Beaverton, OR 97077-0001
* 503-627-5272 (voice) * 503-627-5587 (fax)
http://www.tektronix.com <http://www.tektronix.com/>
http://www.pcb-designer.com <http://www.pcb-designer.com/>
"Off-Grid and Proud of it!"
-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Macindoe, Gary
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 13:46
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: default-x.dlt file snafu
Thanks George, but it's just not working.
When I change to "85.0 40.0", I get the error message:
E- *Error* lowerCase: argument #1 should be either a string or
a symbol (type template = "S") - 40.0
BTW, I have the first "(" up above, and the last ")" below the
line for the slot.
So when my line reads "(85.0 x 40.0) "Plated" "85.0 x 40.0 +/-
4.0")", error message:
E- *Error* length: argument must be a list or an array -
"Plated"
Yes, I have a user field specified in the column definitions:
("User" "TOLERANCE" 10)
My drill chart has Figure, Size, Tolerance, Plated and Qty
columns and works great except for the slot.
It will not plug in the tolerance for the slot, but will for
all of the plated and non-plated holes.
Thanks for your time, when I have time I'll contact support.
Gary
<https://webmail.tek.com/exchange/george.h.patrick/Drafts/RE:%20%5BPCB_FORUM%5D%20Re:%20default-x.dlt%20file%20snafu.EML/1_multipart/ATT125064079.gif>
Gary E. MacIndoe
PCB Design Engineer
Fort Collins, Colorado
amd.com
gary.macindoe@xxxxxxx
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
george.h.patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 1:57 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: default-x.dlt file snafu
Problem 1: Your hole size is incorrectly specified. You need
to have (85.0 40.0) instead of 85.0 x 40.0.
Problem 2: You need to enter ALL the text, not just the
tolerance
The modified line would look line ((85.0 40.0) "Plated" "85.0 X
40.0 +/- 4 MIL") or whatever. This is a SKILL thing, parentheses inside
parenthesis.
Make sure you have a user field specified in your column
definitions, we use
(("Figure" "FIGURE" 6)
("Holesize" "BIT DIA" 8)
("User" "FINISHED HOLE" 24 "Left")
("Quantity" "QTY" 6 "Right"))
--
George Patrick
Tektronix, Inc.
Central Engineering, EDS Applications Support
P.O. Box 500, M/S 39-512
Beaverton, OR 97077-0001
* 503-627-5272 (voice) * 503-627-5587 (fax)
http://www.tektronix.com <http://www.tektronix.com/>
http://www.pcb-designer.com <http://www.pcb-designer.com/>
"Off-Grid and Proud of it!"
-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Macindoe, Gary
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 12:33
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] default-x.dlt file snafu
Hey guys,
Anyone out there modify their drill chart file
("default-mil.dlt" for mils)?
I have a "CustomData" section where the hole size,
Plated or Non-plated and the tolerance is listed.
With Allegro now defining slots, I can't figure out how
to get a slot tolerance to show up in the drill chart.
Here's the line in the "CustomData" section for the
slot that's not working correctly:
(85.0 x 40.0 "Plated" "+/- 4.0")
The size and the word "Plated" shows up in the drill
chart, but not the tolerance (+/- 4.0).
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Gary
<https://webmail.tek.com/exchange/george.h.patrick/Drafts/RE:%20%5BPCB_FORUM%5D%20Re:%20default-x.dlt%20file%20snafu.EML/1_multipart/ATT125064079.gif>
Gary E. MacIndoe
PCB Design Engineer
Fort Collins, Colorado
amd.com
gary.macindoe@xxxxxxx
Other related posts:
