[hipl-dev] Re: binary packaging
- From: Diego Biurrun <diego@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hipl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:53:12 +0100
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> [...]
I'd like to move this issue forward. The single monolithic package idea
does not have many fans, but the current split is too complex.
So how about packages for
- 'hipd' (including hipconf)
- 'hipfw'
- 'dnsproxy'
- 'common' (including docs and shared libs)
- 'all' (virtual package)
This eliminates the 'minimal', 'lib' 'tools' and 'docs' packages.
The pisacert and nsupdate.pl programs could either go in common or
be left out. I'm currently unsure how essential they are.
Diego
Other related posts:
