[hipl-dev] Re: binary packaging
- From: Diego Biurrun <diego@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hipl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:24:45 +0100
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:11:34PM +0200, Miika Komu wrote:
>
> In general, the packages called hipd, hipfw, dnsproxy, common and all
> sound fine to me. Are you going to prefix them with hipl (note that
> there's two other HIP implementations)?
I haven't put much thought to it yet, I was going to keep the package
names as-is, i.e. with prefix. If there are alternative implementations
this is likely the most sensible route.
Diego
Other related posts:
